USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

A Review of Wildlife Management Practices in North Dakota


Effects on Nongame Bird Populations and Habitats


MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: No Till/Minimum Till

Perennially, North Dakota is near the top of the list for loss of soil due to erosion in the Great Plains. Efforts to encourage no till or minimum till practices that benefit wildlife and wetland habitat and provide increased soil and water conservation by keeping the soil in place are pursued. Natural resource agencies will rent specialized equipment for interested landowners. Cultural, mechanical, and biological methods may be used. Funding for this practice goes for rental of no-till seeders for planting winter wheat and for rental of undercutters which destroy weeds with little disturbance to the surface and ground-nesting wildlife which may be present. Since 1987, 6,689 acres of North Dakota cropland have been treated with this project.

QUALIFIERS:

  1. Contrasted with plowing (fall plowing).

Very beneficial: [++] wintering species (horned lark, snow bunting, lapland longspur, redpoll, game birds, galliformes, geese); migrating, field-feeding waterfowl

Beneficial: [+] lark bunting, grasshopper sparrow, western meadowlark, red-winged blackbird, vesper sparrow, nesting ducks, marbled godwit, upland sandpiper, migrating raptors, mourning doves (nest and foraging), killdeer, savannah sparrow, horned lark, willet, Baird's sparrow, chestnut-collared longspur, bobolink, brown-headed cowbird

Negative: [-] mallard, pintail, horned lark, killdeer, vesper sparrow, Franklin's gull, ring-billed gull

Very negative: [--]

Unknown: [?]

COMMENTS: There may be some significant variation in the impacts to individual species when the practice is used in the spring versus autumn. Most species that benefit would benefit from increased foraging opportunities, rather than nesting. Several species might nest to some extent where they would otherwise not nest at all. Much better foraging conditions for both migrants and nesters, especially in a mosaic situation. Several grassland species will use these fields to some extent. The practice should have limited detrimental effects.


Return to Review of Individual Management Practice Effects main page.
Return to Wildlife Management Practices main page.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/wildlife/wildmgmt/effects/notill.htm
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Saturday, 02-Feb-2013 07:30:52 EST
Reston, VA [vaww55]