Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
Central zone represented by low-prairie vegetation (Poa pratensis, Solidago altissima, etc.).
Subclasses: None
Cover types: 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Central zone represented by wet-meadow vegetation (generally fine-stemmed grasses and sedges with associated forbs).
Subclasses:Cover types: 1, 2, 3, and 4.
A - Fresh Poa palustris, Boltonia latisquama, etc. B - Slightly Brackish Hordeum jubatum, Calamagrostis inexpansa, etc.
Central zone represented by shallow-marsh vegetation (moderately coarse grasses and sedges with associated forbs).
Subclasses:Cover types: 1, 2, 3, and 4.
A - Fresh Carex atherodes, Glyceria grandis, etc. B - Slightly Brackish Scolochloa festucacea, Eleocharis palustris, etc. C - Moderately Brackish Alisma gramineum, Beckmannia syzigachne, etc.
Central zone represented by deep-marsh vegetation (relatively coarse marsh emergents or associated submerged aquatics).
Subclasses:Cover types: 1, 2, 3, and 4
A - Fresh Scirpus heterochaetus, etc. B - Slightly Brackish Typha spp., Scirpus acutus, etc. C - Moderately Brackish Scirpus acutus, etc. D - Brackish Scirpus paludosus, Scirpus acutus, etc. E - Subsaline Scirpus paludosus, etc.
Central area represented by permanent-open-water zone (devoid of emergent vegetation, but submerged vegetation, particularly Ruppia occidentalis, often present).
Subclasses (based on species composition of peripheral zones):Cover Types: 3 and 4
B - Slightly Brackish Typha spp., Scolochloa festucacea, etc. C - Moderately Brackish Scirpus acutus, Hordeum jubatum, etc. D - Brackish Scirpus paludosus, Scirpus americanus, etc. E - Subsaline Puccinellia nuttalliana, Salicornia rubra, etc.
Central area represented by intermittent-alkali zone (devoid of emergent vegetation; Ruppia maritima often common).
Subclasses: None
Cover types: 3 and 4
Central zone represented by fen vegetation (Glyceria striata, Carex aquatilis, etc.).
Subclasses: None
Cover types: 1, 2, and 3.
This classification system was tested repeatedly during intensive field studies in North Dakota and was found to be both expedient and realistic. Observations during exploratory trips through other parts of the glaciated prairie region (including the Prairie Provinces of Canada and States adjoining North Dakota) indicate that it is an effective method for the entire region. In certain local areas, particularly those near the margin of the glaciated prairie region, minor modifications may be required. A number of Federal and State and Provincial agencies in the United States and Canada have also field-tested the classification system. Their findings to date generally support the direct application of this system in their wetland investigations.