USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

Urinary 3-methylhistidine and Progressive Winter Undernutrition in White-tailed Deer

Materials and Methods


Experimental design and data collection

We maintained seven adult (≥ 1.5 years) white-tailed deer (four pregnant females, three males) in individual outdoor pens (15.5 x 30.0 m) near Grand Rapids, Minnesota. The study was conducted from 4 February to 5 May 1988. Monthly mean minimum and maximum temperatures were -23.3°, -23.8°, -9.9°, -2.8°, 7.2°C and -9.7°, -6.8°, 2.1°, 12.7°, and 24.1°C for January to May, respectively.

Two males and two females were assigned randomly to the treatment group and one male and two females to the control group. Until 11 February, deer were fed ad libitum a high protein (11.1% crude protein)-high energy (2,990 kcal digestible energy/kg) pelleted diet (DelGiudice et al. 1990; 1994a). Baseline data were collected on 4 February during 0800 to 1200 hours. Using a pole syringe, we anesthetized deer by injection of 100-150 mg xylazine HCl and 200-650 mg ketamine HCl. Once induced, deer were weighed, and blood and urine were collected (DelGiudice et al. 1994a).

Treated deer (i.e., restricted diet) were provided with 0.2-1.0 kg/deer/day of a low protein (7.0% crude protein)-low energy (1,900 kcal digestible energy/kg) pelleted diet from 11 February to 5 May 1988, except for 15 to 19 April (see below). From 11 February to 15 April, each control deer received the same diet ad libitum as the treated deer. We believed ad libitum provision of this diet to be more realistic for a control group in a winter nutrition study, as opposed to an unnatural, high-quality diet (DelGiudice et al. 1994a). To simulate and examine the effect of acute severe nutritional restriction (as might accompany a snowstorm) on control deer, we restricted all seven deer to 0.2 kg of feed per day from 15 to 19 April; ad libitum feeding was resumed for control deer from 19 April (after handling) to 5 May. Overall, mean daily feed intake was 0.53 kg (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.59 kg) and 0.28 kg (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.50 kg) for the control and restricted deer, respectively. Maximum cumulative mass loss was greater in restricted deer (17.0%-32.2%) than in control deer (7.0%-17.4%) (DelGiudice et al. 1994a). Deer were dependent upon snow for water until late February, when we provided water ad libitum.

From 11 February to 5 May, we anesthetized and handled all deer as described above at 1- to 2-week intervals. On average, 10 and 62 minutes elapsed between induction of anesthesia and blood and urine-sampling, respectively (DelGiudice et al. 1994a).

Laboratory and statistical analyses

Urinary creatinine was determined spectrophotometrically with an ABA-100 bichromatic autoanalyzer using modifications of the method of Jaffe (1886). Urinary 3-methylhistidine was analyzed using cationic-exchange resin and spectrophotometry (Vielma et al. 1981; Fitch et al. 1986). Urinary 3-methylhistidine is expressed as a ratio to creatinine (µmol:mg) to correct for differences of hydration and as an estimate of fractional catabolic rate (Haverberg et al. 1975; Coles 1980; Elia et al. 1981; Ballard and Tomas 1983).

We evaluated the temporal pattern of 3-methylhistidine: creatinine in deer from treatment and control groups by fitting a mixed-effects, repeated measures analysis of covariance model to the log-transformed data (ANCOVA; Ware 1985; SAS PROC MIXED, SAS Institute Inc. 1996). The model contained fixed effects for diet, time, time2, diet x time, and diet x time2; deer were modeled as random "subject" effects. Using the techniques of Wolfinger (1993), a first order antedependence covariance structure was selected to account for the within-deer correlations. A mixed effects, repeated measures, polynomial regression model was used to evaluate dependence of 3-methylhistidine:creatinine on percent mass loss of deer. In this case, a compound-symmetry covariance structure was employed. We fit polynomials of the form:

Y = β0 + β1t + β2t2 + β3t3

where t = the time-dependent predictor, percent mass loss. We selected the highest order polynomial that was statistically significant (α = 0.05; Neter et al. 1990).


Previous Section -- Introduction
Return to Contents
Next Section -- Results

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/mammals/wtdeer/methods.htm
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Saturday, 02-Feb-2013 06:02:13 EST
Sioux Falls, SD [sdww54]