USGS Home
Contact USGS
Search USGS

Many farms where depredations occurred within a given year had experienced losses previously during our program. In 1986, about 40% of farms having verified complaints were repeaters from 1 of the previous 2 years. During 1979-86, seven farms (6% of total farms with verified depredations) were considered "chronic" or Type I problem farms (Fritts 1982). One of these farms was the site of depredations during each of 7 years, one during 6 years, one during 5 years, and four during 4 years. Thirty-four percent of all wolf captures were at these seven farms.

Eleven additional farms were the sites of depredations during 3 of the 8 years (1979-86) and were considered "moderately chronic." Chronic problem farms consistently involved depredations by packs of wolves rather than by lone wolves. Wolves were usually trapped at the farms, but enough individuals were usually left to keep the pack going, or the area was rapidly recolonized because of proximity to medium- or high-density wolf populations.

Depredations generally occurred in remote parts of farms, but sites included distant pastures to within a few meters of farm buildings. Losses near buildings were usually in early spring when wolves were visiting livestock carrion that had been disposed of outside the farmyard during winter. Cattle were killed in both wooded pasture and open pasture near woods. Sheep and turkeys were killed in open pasture, but usually were approached from the nearest wooded side. Aside from totally wooded pastures, areas with a mosaic of fields and forests seemed to present the greatest opportunity for depredations. Wolves were reluctant to cross large open spaces. In areas with a sharp transition between expanses of forest and expanses of open pastureland, wolves generally remained in the forest (Fritts and Mech 1981, unpublished data). The same finding was reported in the vicinity of Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba (Carbyn 1980).