Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
Of 178 (six to 40 annually) adult female striped skunks examined, 74% (59-89% annually) were age-class 1, and 26% (11-41%) were age-class 2. Only 5% of all females were >3 years old; the two oldest were 5 years old.
At least 95% (168 of 177) of the females were pregnant (123) or parous (45) in the year collected; reproductive status of one female was not determined. Among eight females believed to be barren, seven were age-class 1, and one was age-class 2. Mean date of collection for pregnant females in all years was 18 April ± 0.9 days.
We noted resorbing embryos in 12 females; 11 had one each, and one had two. The resorption rate was 1.5% (13 of 873 embryos from 123 females). Nine females with resorbing embryos were age-class 1, and three were age-class 2.
Mean estimate of litter size for all pregnant females was 7.2 ± 0.4, based on counts of live embryos. This estimate was not affected by interaction between age class and year (F = 1.40; d.f. = 6,109; P = 0.22) or by age class (F = 0.91; d.f. = 1,109; P = 0.34). However, we detected differences among annual estimates for both age classes combined (F = 3.90; d.f. = 6,109; P = 0.001). Annual mean estimates were 7.3 ± 0.3 (1979, n = 22), 8.2 ± 0.5 (1980, n = 20), 9.5 ± 0.9 (1981, n = 4), 7.0 ± 0.5 (1987, n = 15), 5.9 ± 0.6 (1988, n = 12), 6.1 ± 0.4 (1989, n = 25), and 6.7 ± 0.4 (1990, n = 25). Estimates for 1979, 1980, 1981, and 1987 were not different, nor were estimates for 1979, 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990. The largest estimate of litter size for a female in age-class 1 was 12 and for a female in age-class 2 was 11. We estimated that litter sizes were six and seven for the 5-year-old females.
Mean implantation date for the subsample of 68 pregnant females was 4 March ± 1.6 days. Annual sample sizes are as noted in the previous paragraph, minus two skunks in 1979 and one in 1990 in which embryos were too small to measure. Sixty-five (96%) of the 68 females were >2 weeks pregnant when collected. We observed no effect on implantation date from interaction between age class and year (F = 1.29; d.f. = 3,60; F = 0.29). Differences in implantation dates were not detected between age classes (F = 0.21; d.f. = 1,60; P = 0.64) or among years (F = 2.24; d.f. = 3,60; P = 0.09).
Mean proportion of embryos that were female in litters was 55 ± 4%. We detected an interaction between age-class and year (F = 3.52; d.f. = 3,35; P = 0.03), indicating that sex ratios varied among years or between age-classes. Differences detected between age classes in proportion of embryos that were female were significant (P = 0.05) only in 1980 (Table 1). Differences detected annually in proportion of embryos that were female by age class revealed no consistent relationships.
| Table 1. Least-squares means (± 1 SE) of proportion of embryos that were female in pregnant striped skunks (n) collected in North Dakota and Minnesota by age class (1 = 1 year old, 2 = ≥2 years old). | ||||
| Year | Proportion of females | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age-class 1 | Age-class 2 | |||
±
SE |
n | ±
SE |
n | |
| 1979 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 11 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 7 |
| 1980a | 0.41 ± 0.07 | 6 | 0.79 ± 0.10 | 3 |
| 1981 | 0.72 ± 0.10 | 3 | 0.55 ± 0.16 | 1 |
| 1990 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 11 | 0.43 ± 0.16 | 1 |
| a Means within year differ significantly between age classes (P < 0.05, Fisher's protected least significance differenceMilliken and Johnson, 1984). | ||||
The estimate of the overall mean litter based on corpora lutea (7.1 ± 0.2) was 0.9 smaller than the estimate of the mean litter based on live embryos (8.0 ± 0.2) for the same skunks (F = 14.8; d.f. = 1,62; P = 0.0003). We detected a significant effect on those estimates due to interaction between estimation method and year (F = 2.7; d.f. = 1,62; P = 0.05), but other interactions were not significant (P ≥ 0.3). In 1979 and 1980, the litter estimate based on corpora lutea was significantly lower than the litter estimate based on live embryos (P < 0.05); the same trend was evident in 1981 and 1990 (Table 2). Age class also had a significant effect on litter estimates (F = 4.47; d.f. = 1,64; P = 0.04), implying that differences between age-classes were consistent regardless of estimation method. The estimate of the overall mean litter for age-class 1 was 7.1 ± 0.2 and for age-class 2 was 8.0 ± 0.4 (P < 0.05).
| Table 2. Least-squares means (± 1 SE) of potential litter sizes of striped skunks collected in North Dakota and Minnesota, based on numbers of corpora lutea of macroscopically counted numbers of live embryos in individual pregnant females (n). | ||||
| Year | Litter size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpora lutea | Live embryos | |||
± SE |
n | ± SE |
n | |
| 1979a | 6.6 ± 0.2 | 20 | 7.3 ± 0.2 | 20 |
| 1980a | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 20 | 8.2 ± 0.3 | 20 |
| 1981 | 8.8 ± 0.6 | 4 | 9.5 ± 0.6 | 4 |
| 1990 | 6.6 ± 0.2 | 27 | 7.1 ± 0.2 | 27 |
| a Means within year differ significantly between estimation methods (P < 0.05, Fisher's protected least significant differenceMilliken and Johnson, 1984). | ||||