USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

Effects of Management Practices on Wetland Birds:

Eared Grebe

Drawing by Patsy Renz: Eared Grebe

This report is one in a series of literature syntheses on North American grassland birds. The need for these reports was identified by the Prairie Pothole Joint Venture (PPJV), a part of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan. The PPJV recently adopted a new goal, to stabilize or increase populations of declining grassland- and wetland-associated wildlife species in the Prairie Pothole Region. To further that objective, it is essential to understand the habitat needs of birds other than waterfowl, and how management practices affect their habitats. The focus of these reports is on management of breeding habitat, particularly in the northern Great Plains.

This resource is based on the following source:

Dechant, J. A., D. H. Johnson, C. M. Goldade, J. O. Church, and B. R. Euliss.  2002.  Effects of management practices on wetland birds: Eared Grebe.  Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND.  20 pages.

This resource should be cited as:

Dechant, J. A., D. H. Johnson, C. M. Goldade, J. O. Church, and B. R. Euliss.  2002.  Effects of management practices on wetland birds: Eared Grebe.  Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online. (Version 01JUL03).

Adobe PDF  View the PDF version of this Species Account  (requires a PDF Reader, download free reader)

Effects of Management Practices on Wetland Birds:

Eared Grebe

Jill A. Dechant, Douglas H. Johnson, Christopher M. Goldade,
James O. Church, and Betty R. Euliss

Series Coordinator: Douglas H. Johnson
Series Assistant Coordinator: Jill A. Dechant

Reviewer: Janet S. Boe

Range Map: Jeff T. Price

Illustration: Patsy Renz

Funding: Prairie Pothole Joint Venture
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Geological Survey

Organization and Features of this Species Account

Information on the habitat requirements and effects of habitat management on wetland birds were summarized from information in more than 500 published and unpublished papers. A range map is provided to indicate the relative densities of the species in North America, based on Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data. Although the BBS may not capture the presence of elusive waterbird species, the BBS is a standardized survey and the range maps, in many cases, represent the most consistent information available on species' distributions. Although birds frequently are observed outside the breeding range indicated, the maps are intended to show areas where managers might concentrate their attention. It may be ineffectual to manage habitat at a site for a species that rarely occurs in an area. The species account begins with a brief capsule statement, which provides the fundamental components or keys to management for the species. A section on breeding range outlines the current breeding distribution of the species in North America, including areas that could not be mapped using BBS data. The suitable habitat section describes the breeding habitat and occasionally microhabitat characteristics of the species, especially those habitats that occur in the Great Plains. Details on habitat and microhabitat requirements often provide clues to how a species will respond to a particular management practice. A table near the end of the account complements the section on suitable habitat, and lists the specific habitat characteristics for the species by individual studies. The area requirements section provides details on territory and home range sizes, minimum area requirements, and the effects of patch size, edges, and other landscape and habitat features on abundance and productivity. It may be futile to manage a small block of suitable habitat for a species that has minimum area requirements that are larger than the area being managed. The section on brood parasitism summarizes information on intra- and interspecific parasitism, host responses to parasitism, and factors that influence parasitism, such as nest concealment and host density. The impact of management depends, in part, upon a species' nesting phenology and biology. The section on breeding-season phenology and site fidelity includes details on spring arrival and fall departure for migratory populations in the Great Plains, peak breeding periods, the tendency to renest after nest failure or success, and the propensity to return to a previous breeding site. The duration and timing of breeding varies among regions and years. Species' response to management summarizes the current knowledge and major findings in the literature on the effects of different management practices on the species. The section on management recommendations complements the previous section and summarizes recommendations for habitat management provided in the literature. The literature cited contains references to published and unpublished literature on the management effects and habitat requirements of the species. This section is not meant to be a complete bibliography; a searchable, annotated bibliography of published and unpublished papers dealing with habitat needs of wetland birds and their responses to habitat management is posted on the main page under the section Searchable Bibliography.

Downloading Instructions -- Instructions on downloading and extracting files from this site.

(Download) (74K) -- Effects of Management Practices on Wetland Birds: Eared Grebe

Installation: Extract all files and open eagr.htm in a web browser.

Eared Grebe
(Podiceps nigricollis)
GIF - Eared Grebe range map.
Figure.  Breeding distribution of Eared Grebes in the United States and southern Canada, based on Breeding Bird Survey data, 1985-1991. Scale represents average number of individuals detected per route per year. Map from Price, J., S. Droege, and A. Price. 1995. The summer atlas of North American birds. Academic Press, London, England. 364 pages. Circles indicate other locations with known breeding populations (K). Information courtesy of Janet S. Boe.

Keys to management include maintaining wetlands with few trees around the perimeter and >70% open water interspersed with areas of emergent or floating, submergent vegetation.

Breeding Range:

Eared Grebes breed from eastcentral British Columbia through southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, south to eastern Washington, eastcentral Oregon, to southeastern California, and east to northern Arizona and New Mexico, westcentral Texas, northcentral Colorado, westcentral Nebraska, northwestern Iowa, and western Minnesota (National Geographic Society 1999). (See figure for the relative densities of Eared Grebes in the United States and southern Canada, based on Breeding Bird Survey data.)

Suitable habitat:

Wetlands with areas of open water and beds of submergent aquatic plants appear to be critical components of suitable habitat (Bent 1963, Stewart 1975). Open water may be important because grebes congregate in open water when disturbed from their nests, and also because they need a running start before taking flight (Boe 1992). Submergent vegetation may be important for lessening the impact of turbulent water on nests, for harboring large populations of invertebrates, and for providing material for nest construction (Boe 1992). In Nebraska, a high degree of interspersion of open water and vegetation was required to provide foraging habitat for adults and young (Faanes and Lingle 1995). In Iowa, adult grebes moved their young about 180 m to open water (Friley and Hendrickson 1937). Eared Grebes use wetlands with large beds of submerged aquatic plants such as algal mats (Chlorophyceae and Cyanophyceae), muskgrass (Chara spp.), sago pondweed (Stuckenia pectinatus), claspingleaf pondweed (Potamogeton richardsonii), widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima), and common watermilfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) (Stewart 1975, Boe 1993), and emergent plants such as hardstem bulrush (Schoenoplectus acutus) (Faanes and Lingle 1995) and reeds (Phragmites) (Salt and Salt 1976). Suitable habitat includes freshwater and saline seasonal, semipermanent, and permanent wetlands and lakes, shallow river impoundments, stock ponds, and sewage lagoons (Stewart 1975, Krapu and Green 1978, Knodel 1979, Johnsgard 1980, Uresk and Severson 1988, Boe 1992, Faanes and Lingle 1995, Baylor 1998, Cullen et al. 1999).

Wetland preference by breeding Eared Grebes was examined in western and southern Minnesota (Boe 1991, 1992). Twenty-four wetlands used for nesting were compared to a random sample of 26 unused wetlands in the same or adjacent counties. Wetlands were classified as fresh and shallow (about 15 cm deep), fresh and deep (about 15-91 cm deep), or fresh and open (water usually <3 m deep and fringed with emergent vegetation). Eared Grebes preferred fresh wetlands with maximum depths ≤3 m, >70% open water, abundant submergent vegetation, perimeters that were partially composed of trees, and wetlands without designated public access and little or no fishing or motorboating (Boe 1991, 1992). Wetlands with buildings along the wetland perimeter were not occupied by Eared Grebes. No differences were found between used and unused wetlands for percentage of wetland composed of open water (water generally was >50% open) or emergent fringe, or for percentage of wetland perimeter with nearby road or highway within 0.2 km. Wetlands used by Eared Grebes were generally composed of 78% open water and 60% emergent fringe, and included a perimeter of which 32% was composed of trees and 27% was composed of a road or highway within 0.2 km. Unused wetlands were generally composed of 68% open water and 38% emergent fringe, and included a perimeter in which 65% was composed of trees and 30% was composed of a road or highway within 0.2 km. In northwestern North Dakota, wetland size and vegetation cover appeared to be more important factors affecting selection of wetlands by Eared Grebes than wetland type (Faaborg 1976). Eared Grebes preferred large (>7.3 ha) wetlands over small (≤7.3 ha) wetlands, and preferred wetlands with large expanses of open water (≥95% open water) to wetlands with large areas of emergent vegetation (not defined). They were found in seasonal and semipermanent wetlands and in lakes. In the prairie pothole region of North Dakota, the highest densities of Eared Grebes were in seasonal wetlands, followed by semipermanent and permanent wetlands (Kantrud and Stewart 1984). The species was not found in ephemeral, temporary, alkaline, fen, or tilled wetlands. In central North Dakota, Eared Grebes were found in ephemeral, temporary, seasonal, semipermanent, permanent, and alkaline wetlands; highest densities occurred on permanent wetlands (Faanes 1982). In British Columbia, the best predictor of use of a wetland for breeding was area of emergent vegetation, not total wetland area, area of open water, or mean depth of wetland (Cullen 1998).

Nests are platforms of decaying and live vegetation obtained from the water column or from the bottom of wetlands, and are anchored to submergent vegetation, dead and living emergent vegetation, or floating mats in 10-123 cm of open water or among emergent vegetation (Goss 1883, Smith 1890, Abbott 1902, Rockwell 1910, Roberts 1932, McAllister 1958, Stewart 1975, Bryant 1983, Ray and Kruse 1989, Boe 1993, Lyon and Everding 1996). Vegetation such as algae, dead cattail (Typha spp.), cottonwood (Populus deltoides)/willow (Salix amygdaloides, S. interior), common bladderwort (Utricularia vulgaris), coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum), sago pondweed, goosefoot (Chenopodium rubrum), or hardstem bulrush are used as nest material (Bryant 1983, See et al. 1992, Boe 1993, Hill et al. 1997). Nests may be anchored to emergent plants such as hardstem bulrush, alkali bulrush (Scirpus maritimus), sprangletop (Scolochloa festucacea), and golden dock (Rumex maritimus), or built on dense, floating mats of submergent vegetation or algae (Friley and Hendrickson 1937, Stewart 1975, See et al. 1992, Boe 1993). Nests also may be attached to Franklin's Gull (Larus pipixcan) nests (Roberts 1932; Burger and Gochfeld 1995; J. S. Brice, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, pers. comm.). In North Dakota, nests were generally in semi-open stands of emergent vegetation or in moderately dense cover within a few meters of open water (Stewart 1975). Distance from nests to open water ranged from 0 to 50 m (Boe 1991). Distance from nest to shore ranged from 15 to 1500 m (Smith 1890, Friley and Hendrickson 1937, Stewart 1975, Boe 1993). In Minnesota, nests that were built on dead or live emergent vegetation were initiated significantly earlier (about 1 mo) than nests built on floating mats (Boe 1993).

Eared Grebes nest in colonies that range in size from a dozen to several thousand nests, and rarely nest singly (Goss 1883; Smith 1890; Job 1902; Judd 1917; Roberts 1932; Friley and Hendrickson 1937; Buresh 1971; Stewart 1975; Faaborg 1976; Bryant 1983; Ray and Kruse 1989; Baylor 1998; Breault 1990; Boe 1994; Cullen et al. 1999; J. S. Brice, pers. comm.). Eared Grebes may locate colonies near open water or wetland channels (Boe 1993). First nests in a colony form a nucleus for future nests (Friley and Hendrickson 1937, McAllister 1958, Boe 1994). More than one colony may be formed on a body of water; for example, in British Columbia, two colonies were 200 m apart (Lyon and Everding 1996). Distances between nests within a colony have been reported as 0 to 9.5 m, and depend on habitat conditions (Job 1902, Friley and Hendrickson 1937, McAllister 1958, Buresh 1971, Ray and Kruse 1989, Lyon and Everding 1996, Hill et al. 1997). Hill et al. (1997) reported that nests in a low-density colony were farther apart (3.3 versus 1.4 m, respectively) than in a high-density colony (numbers of nests within low- and high-density colonies were not given). Depredation rate was higher in the low-density colony than in the high-density colony. Aggression rates, time spent in aggressive activities, egg loss due to conspecific interference, and intraspecific brood parasitism were higher in the high-density colony than in the low-density colony. No differences in clutch size or egg volume were detected between high- and low-density colonies. Boe (1994) found that distances to the nearest neighbor were shorter for colonies built in dense, green emergent vegetation than colonies built in sparser, more open, dead emergent vegetation or on open surface mats. As colonies developed, distances tended to decrease, possibly because aggression abated as the breeding season progressed. The colony with the greatest emergent stem density had the greatest nest density and the shortest distance to the nearest neighbor. Distance from shore to colony sites was significantly and positively associated with wetland area and was significantly farther than for random points; distance from shore may represent a compromise between reducing depredation by terrestrial predators and minimizing destruction of nests by high waves near the center of wetlands (Boe 1991, 1993).

In addition to Franklin's Gulls, Eared Grebes may nest among, although not attached to nests, of other colony-nesting species, such as Western Grebes (Aechmophorus occidentalis), and Forster's Terns (Sterna forsteri) (Abbott 1902, Boe 1993, Cullen et al. 1999). They also may nest in proximity to Horned Grebes (Podiceps auritus), Pied-billed Grebes (Podilymbus podiceps), Ruddy Ducks (Oxyura jamaicensis), American Coots (Fulica americana), or Black Terns (Chlidonias niger) (Abbott 1902, Roberts 1932, Bent 1963, Valadka 1988). Pied-billed Grebes may harass Eared Grebes, although young Pied-billed Grebes may associate with postbreeding Eared Grebes without aggression (Cullen et al. 1999). American Coots may depredate Eared Grebe nests (Breault 1990, Boe 1994, Hill et al. 1997). A table near the end of the account lists the specific habitat characteristics for Eared Grebes by study.

Area requirements:

Eared Grebes nest in wetlands ranging widely in size. In Minnesota, wetlands used for breeding were 33-3785 ha, compared to 36-5793 ha for unused wetlands (Boe 1992). However, small wetlands are uncommon in Minnesota due to drainage for agricultural purposes. Among wetlands with colonies, larger wetlands tended to have larger colonies. In North Dakota, three of 221 nests were in small (<3 ha) wetlands with ≥95% open water, and 218 nests were on large (≥7.3 ha) wetlands with open water (Faaborg 1976). Stewart (1975) indicated that Eared Grebes breed on lakes or wetlands ≥4 ha (no upper limit was given), whereas Daub (1993) found Eared Grebes on wetlands 1-19.3 ha. Daub sampled wetlands ranging from <1 to 19.3 ha. During a drought year in Minnesota, Eared Grebes were observed on small (<300 ha) wetlands in May and early June that were dry later in the summer; after early June, two of the largest colonies recorded in the state were found on large (>3000 ha) wetlands (Boe 1992).

Brood parasitism:
Eared Grebes are conspecific brood parasites (Lyon and Everding 1996) and may lay eggs in other Eared Grebe nests (Gollop 1958, Bent 1963). Lyon and Everding (1996) determined that 38% of 47 nests in two colonies experienced brood parasitism. Five nests were multiply parasitized, and most cases of multiple laying were by different females. Of 21 conspecific brood parasitism events reported by Hill et al. (1997), three nests each contained two parasitic eggs and 18 nests each contained one parasitic egg. No records of brood parasitism by Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) are known.

Breeding-season phenology and site fidelity:

In the southern Great Plains, Eared Grebes arrive on the breeding grounds as early as mid-February, continue to arrive through May, and depart for the wintering grounds from late August through November (Rockwell 1910, Johnsgard 1980, Thompson and Ely 1989). In the northern Great Plains, Eared Grebes arrive from early April through May and depart for the wintering grounds in September and October (Judd 1917, Roberts 1932, Bent 1963, Maher 1974, Stewart 1975, Salt and Salt 1976, Knapton 1979, Faanes 1981, Janssen 1987, South Dakota Ornithologists' Union 1991, See et al. 1992).

Eared Grebes are known to renest after destruction of the initial nest (Rockwell 1910, Boe 1993, Lyon and Everding 1996). Double-broodedness has not been documented (Bent 1963, Cullen et al. 1999). Eared Grebes may exhibit site fidelity. In British Columbia, six of 14 adults that had broods the previous year returned to the same breeding colony, compared to eight of 46 adults without broods (Breault 1990). In another British Columbia study, three of 26 males and three of 21 females captured the previous year returned to breed on the same wetland the following year (Cullen 1998). Two males and one female returned to breed in the study area but not on the same wetland. Five males and six females that bred in the study area during the first year were resighted the second year, but did not stay to breed. Also in British Columbia, an Eared Grebe was recaptured four years later in the same general area in which it was banded (Clapp et al. 1982). Based on North American banding records from several sources, of 1052 banded Eared Grebes, 1.2% were recovered 1-4 yr later in the breeding areas where they had been banded (Jehl and Yochem 1986).

Species' response to management:

Little is known about the effects of burning, mowing, or grazing on Eared Grebes. Eared Grebes are negatively impacted by wetland drainage, by diversion of water for agricultural purposes, and by maintenance of high water levels for recreational activities (Koonz and Rakowski 1985, Boe 1992, Faanes and Lingle 1995). In response to yearly fluctuations of water levels and subsequent changes in vegetation, Eared Grebes use different wetlands, different locations within wetlands, and different types of wetlands from year to year (Boe 1992). Maintaining a complex of wetland sizes and types is important, even if an individual wetland is not used every year. Eared Grebes may abandon nests when water levels drop, depending on depth of remaining water (Boe 1994).

High concentrations of selenium in eggs may cause embryotoxicity, that is, embryo deformity or death (Skorupa and Ohlendorf 1991). Irrigation over soils that have a high selenium content causes leaching of selenium from the soil to the groundwater (See et al. 1992). Selenium often is present in evaporation ponds that receive subsurface agricultural drainage water; these ponds often attract large numbers of waterbirds (Skorupa and Ohlendorf 1991). Skorupa and Ohlendorf (1991) investigated the level of selenium that represented a significant threshold of toxicity to waterbirds. Median selenium concentration from 74 sample means (sample means based on samples of two to nine eggs) from wild birds in nonmarine wetlands was 1.9 per million (ppm) dry weight. The interquartile range was 1.4 to 2.4 ppm. The authors suggested that >3 ppm mean egg selenium indicated avian contamination in nonmarine environments. Avian contamination was defined as mean selenium in eggs (mean egg selenium) above normal (background) concentrations. In the Tulare Basin, California, avian contamination of >3 ppm was associated with evaporation ponds that contained 1-3 parts per billion (ppb) waterborne selenium (Skorupa and Ohlendorf 1991). Mean egg selenium ranging from 8 to 37 ppm indicated various levels of embryotoxicity.

In California, an exposure-response relationship existed between selenium concentration in Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) and American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) eggs and incidence of embryo deformity (Robinson et al. 1997, Skorupa 1998). Eggs with selenium concentrations of ≤40 ppm dry weight had 0% incidence (486 eggs) of deformed embryos; eggs with 41-60 ppm selenium had 5% (of 26 eggs) deformity, eggs with 61-80 ppm selenium had 8.3% (14 eggs) deformity, and eggs with 81-110 ppm had 25% (15 eggs) deformity. Percentages were calculated by weighting results for each 5-ppm interval equally. Embryotoxicity of >24 ppm mean egg selenium was associated with evaporation ponds that contained 10-20 ppb waterborne selenium.

However, for Eared Grebes in particular, avian contamination of 3 ppm was associated with waterborne selenium levels as low as <1 ppb (Skorupa and Ohlendorf 1991). Unlike other waterbirds that use more than one wetland for foraging, Eared Grebes often remain on the wetland in which their nesting colony is located, foraging on aquatic invertebrates within that wetland. Because of the tendency to remain on one wetland, Eared Grebes may reflect a one-to-one relationship between levels of waterborne selenium in a wetland and actual bioaccumulation of selenium.

In Wyoming, selenium levels in lakes of 38 to 54 ppb were associated with high selenium levels in eggs (>8 ppm) and livers (>30 ppm) of adult Eared Grebes (both live and dead birds) (See et al. 1992, Skorupa 1998). Of 151 Eared Grebe eggs, selenium concentrations ranged from 39.4 to 121 ppm dry weight and averaged 75.1 ppm dry weight. Mean egg concentrations of >13 ppm dry weight were associated with embryo deformities. Of 50 embryos, 10% were malformed. Crossed bills and malformed legs and feet were the most common types of deformities. Mean concentrations of >8 ppm dry weight were associated with impaired egg hatchability. Cause of selenium embryotoxicity was irrigation over soils derived from Cody shale, which tended to have a high selenium content. Selenium discharge from sub-basins was related to irrigation intensity (measured by the area of irrigated land) and the concentrations of selenium in groundwater.

At Freezout Lake Wildlife Management Area and Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge in westcentral Montana, elevated levels of selenium were found in Eared Grebe embryos and livers (Nimick et al. 1996). Water sources for both lakes were irrigation return flow, surface runoff, and direct precipitation. At Freezout Lake, based on 20 embryos, geometric mean selenium concentration ranged from 10 to 18 ppm and averaged 14 ppm. Livers from 10 Eared Grebes contained selenium concentrations ranging from 8.3 to 27 ppm and averaging 14 ppm. At Benton Lake, based on 13 embryos, geometric mean selenium concentration ranged from 6.3 to 20 ppm and averaged 12 ppm. Livers from 31 Eared Grebes contained selenium concentrations ranging from 3.6 to 74 ppm and averaged 22 ppm.

At a lake in southwestern North Dakota, 45 of 46 eggs had selenium concentrations >3.2 ppm dry weight and averaged 4.5 ppm (Olson and Welsh 1993). At a selenium-contaminated site in California, mean selenium concentration in 18 Eared Grebe eggs was 69.7 ppm dry weight (Ohlendorf et al. 1986). Of 141 nests, 116 (82%) nests hatched at least one normal chick, 84 (60%) nests contained one or more dead embryos, and 22 (16%) nests contained one or more deformed embryos or chicks.

Fences, power lines, and television towers placed near, over, or through wetlands may cause mortality if Eared Grebes collide with the structures (Avery and Clement 1972, McKenna 1976, Malcolm 1982, Faanes 1987, Allen and Ramirez 1990). Oil spills and loss of waterproofing ability of feathers caused by detergent in water (a condition that may occur in sewage lagoons) also may cause mortality (Lincoln 1939, Nero 1968).

Management Recommendations:

Few species-specific management recommendations were found for Eared Grebe. The management recommendations that follow are based on the species' habitat requirements or apply to the community of wetland bird species as a whole. Eared Grebes require areas of emergent or submergent vegetation and the presence of an open-water zone. The ratio of emergent vegetation to open water can be controlled through periodic flooding of wetlands (Weller and Fredrickson 1973). Periodic drawdowns of wetlands followed by reflooding may increase invertebrate supply for Eared Grebes (Boe 1991).

In response to wetland suitability and availability with respect to yearly fluctuation of water levels, and thus also to changes in vegetation, Eared Grebes may use the same or different wetlands, different locations within wetlands, or different types of wetlands from year to year (Boe 1992, Cullen 1998). Therefore, maintaining a complex of wetland sizes and types is important, even if an individual wetland is not used every year (Boe 1992). The ideal management strategy for waterbirds is to maintain wetland complexes and large wetlands or lakes (Weller 1999). Because of variation in water levels over seasons or years, wetland complexes are more likely to have at least some wetlands with water and plant regimes favorable to a particular species, thus ensuring diverse species' representation in a geographical area. Wetlands should not be managed as isolated units (Cullen 1998). Whereas wetlands used every year may lead to regional persistence of Eared Grebe populations, wetlands used infrequently may allow entry of first-time breeders into a population. Eared Grebes may stay in a region based on local availability of wetlands. Individuals may decide to move to a new wetland based on the condition of another wetland in the region. Maximizing the availability of wetlands would therefore decrease the risk of regional extinction.

Eared Grebes avoid wetlands with high human disturbance, such as wetlands with designated public access, summer fishing, or motorboating (Boe 1992). The long-term protection of wetlands can be achieved through conservation easements and purchases of wetland basins (VanRees-Siewert 1993, VanRees-Siewert and Dinsmore 1996), and relocation of proposed housing developments (Koonz and Rakowski 1985). Additions to existing wetland complexes should be acquired whenever possible so that complexes become large enough to include different stages of vegetative development (Brown and Dinsmore 1986, Fredrickson and Reid 1986).

Wetland drainage, wetland diversion, and maintenance of high water levels for recreation (such as conversion into fishing lakes) are incompatible with use for breeding by Eared Grebes (Boe 1992, Faanes and Lingle 1995). Water levels should not be maintained at consistent levels (Koonz and Rakowski 1985). Wetland drainage can be addressed by enacting and enforcing anti-drainage legislation (Boe 1992).

To reduce risk of avian contamination and toxicity due to drainage water, either the amount of contaminants in drainage water should be reduced, or avian use of contaminated ponds should be reduced (Skorupa and Ohlendorf 1991, Skorupa 1998). To prevent avian toxicity but not avian contamination, drainage water should be purified to <10 ppb waterborne selenium. To minimize avian contamination, drainage water should be purified to <2.3 ppb waterborne selenium. However, as these standards cannot be met with current technology, deterring avian use of contaminated drainage water may be the only option. Drainage water containing 3-20 ppb selenium should be considered potentially hazardous to waterbirds, whereas >20 ppb selenium should be considered definitely hazardous to waterbirds.

Mortality due to fences can be prevented by reviewing fence construction and modifying plans for proposed management projects (Allen and Ramirez 1990). Fences placed through wetlands should be replaced or marked to make them conspicuous and to decrease likelihood of bird/fence collisions. Power lines should not be constructed through or within 1 km of known historical high-water marks of wetlands, through dry basins known to hold water intermittently, or through heavily used waterbird migration routes (Malcolm 1982). In cases where power lines must cross flyways, an attempt should be made to mask the lines with structures such as bridges (McKenna 1976). Power lines should be buried where possible and corridors established where power lines can be congregated to reduce their proliferation (McKenna 1976).

Table.  Eared Grebe habitat characteristics.

Author(s) Location(s) Habitat(s) Studied* Species-specific Habitat Characteristics
Abbott 1902 North Dakota Wetland Nested in water 0.76-1.2 m deep
Baylor 1998 South Dakota Impoundment Nested in open, shallow water on a 20-ha impoundment
Boe 1991 Minnesota Sewage lagoon, wetland Used wetlands were characterized by 78% open water, 60% emergent fringe, 32% treed perimeter, and 27% of wetland perimeter with a road within 0.2 km; unused wetlands were characterized by 68% open water, 38% emergent fringe, 65% treed perimeter, and 30% of wetland perimeter with a road within 0.2 km; colonies were found in stands of willow (Salix amygdaloides, S. interior) and cottonwood (Populus deltoides) without any submerged macrophytes, and on mats of submergent vegetation in sewage lagoons; during the drought year of 1988, used smaller (<300 ha) wetlands in May and June, but moved to larger (>3000 ha) wetlands after that time
Boe 1992 Minnesota Wetland Used wetlands >30 ha (range 33 to 3785 ha) for breeding, compared to 36 to 5793 ha for unused wetlands; however, small wetlands were scarce in the area; large wetlands supported large nesting colonies during drought years; colony size was positively correlated with wetland size; preferred deep, fresh wetlands over shallow, fresh wetlands and open, fresh wetlands fringed by emergent vegetation; used wetlands were negatively associated with deep (>3 m) water, designated public access, summer fishing and motorboating, and treed wetland perimeters; wetlands with buildings along the wetland perimeter were not used; no difference was found between used and unused wetlands for percent open water (>50% open), percent of wetland perimeter with emergent fringe, or percent of perimeter with nearby road or highway
Boe 1993 Minnesota Wetland All 12 colonies that were studied were near open water or channels; nests built on live or dead emergent vegetation were initiated significantly earlier than nests built on floating mats; nesting substrates were algal (Chlorophyceae and Cyanophpyceae) mats, dead cattails (Typha spp.), sago pondweed (Stuckenia pectinatus) mats, hardstem bulrush (Schoenoplectus acutus) islands, bulrush/pondweed mats, cottonwood/willow, cattail/coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) mats, bladderwort (Utricularia vulgaris)/algal mats, and dead goosefoot (Chenopodium rubrum); mean water depth at 12 colony sites ranged from 0.5 to 1.2 m, with an overall mean of 0.88 m; distance from shore to colony sites ranged from 90 to 1500 m, with a mean of 380 m, and was significantly and positively associated with wetland area
Boe 1994 Minnesota Wetland Nests built in green emergent vegetation had shorter distances to the nearest neighbor than nests built in dead emergent vegetation or on surface mats; as colonies developed, distances decreased; the colony with the greatest emergent stem density had the greatest nest density and the shortest distance to the nearest neighbor
Breault 1990 British Columbia Wetland Wetlands used for breeding were alkaline (pH of 8.3), shallow (1-3-m deep), and ranged in size from 0.7 to 716 ha; mean water depth at 19 nest sites was 0.9 m; in a comparison of ten wetlands with nesting areas close (≤5 m) to shore with 16 wetlands with nesting areas far (>5 m) from shore, the number of breeding pairs was significantly lower on wetlands with nesting areas close to shore than on wetlands with nesting areas far from shore; nests close to shore were more concealed but were more susceptible to nest depredation, whereas nests far from shore were less concealed but were less affected by nest depredation
J. S. Brice, pers. comm. North Dakota Wetland Colonies composed solely of Eared Grebe nests contained from 9 to 466 nests; colonies composed of Eared Grebe and Franklin's Gull nests contained up to 8890 grebe nests
Bryant 1983 Kansas Wetland Nested in 0.46 m of open water on floating platforms of coontail and sago pondweed
Buresh 1971 North Dakota Wetland Fifty-five nests were within an area of about 0.2 ha; nests were 0.61-0.91 m apart
Burger and Gochfeld 1995 Minnesota Wetland As many as seven grebe nests were attached to one Franklin's Gull (Larus pipixcan) nest, although the usual number was 1-3 grebe nests per gull nest; compared to random points, nests were placed in areas with higher percent floating vegetation and more live hardstem bulrush stems within 1 m of the nest; 32 grebe nests were characterized by an average of 20.8 cm distance to nearest vegetation, 37.9% floating vegetation cover around nest, and four live hardstem bulrush stems around nest
Cullen 1998 British Columbia Wetland Best predictor of use of a wetland for breeding was area of emergent vegetation, not total wetland area, area of open water, or mean depth of wetland
Daub 1993 Manitoba Wetland Nested in wetlands >1 ha in size
Faaborg 1976 North Dakota Wetland Nested colonially, only four of 222 nests were solitary; of 221 nests, three were in small (<3 ha) wetlands with ≥95% open water and 218 were on large (≥7.3 ha) wetlands with open water
Faanes 1982 North Dakota Wetland Occurred in all wetland classes (ephemeral, temporary, seasonal, semipermanent, permanent, and alkali), but highest densities occurred on permanent wetlands
Faanes and Lingle 1995 Nebraska Sewage lagoon, wetland Required dense stands of emergent aquatic vegetation such as hardstem bulrush for nesting and a high degree of vegetation/open water interspersion for foraging habitat for adults and young; occurred on sewage lagoons
Friley and Hendrickson 1937 Iowa Wetland Nested about 113 m from the east shore of a wetland in a thin stand of hardstem bulrush; nests were made of live vegetation pulled from the bottom of the wetland, were 1.5-9.5 m apart, and appeared to be arranged in semicircles around a center nest; after hatching, grebes moved about 180 m to more open water
Goss 1883 North Dakota Lake Nested colonially; nests were built of live or dead vegetation in water 0.91 m deep
Hill et al. 1997 Oregon Lake Nests were constructed of goosefoot or hardstem bulrush; nests were significantly closer (0.68 m apart) to one another at one of the study lakes than at the other study lake (1.55 m); distances between nests within two colonies in the same lake also differed significantly; nests in the low-density colony were 2.5 times farther apart than in the high-density colony
Johnsgard 1980 Nebraska Impoundment, wetland Breeding occurred in wetlands and shallow river impoundments with an abundance of submerged aquatic plants
Kantrud and Stewart 1984 North Dakota Wetland complex Highest density occurred in seasonal wetlands, followed by semipermanent and permanent wetlands; did not occur in ephemeral, temporary, alkaline, fen, or tilled wetlands
McAllister 1958 British Columbia Wetland Colonies were built in dense reedbeds or in the open; nests were 0.3-0.91 m apart and in water 0.3-1.07 m deep and were constructed of live or dead vegetation; first nests in a colony formed a nucleus for future nests
Ray and Kruse 1989 South Dakota Wetland Nests were constructed of floating aquatic vegetation, were in water 0.61-0.91 m deep, and were 0.9-6 m apart; colony was in an area composed of half water and half cattail
Roberts 1932 Minnesota Wetland Nested in colonies; nests were frail and floated in 0.15-0.3 m of water, among grasses and rushes, and were constructed of decaying vegetation and green vegetation from the bottom of the water
Rockwell 1910 Colorado Wetland Built flimsy, unconcealed nests on slight platforms of vegetative stems floating in open water or in sparse growths of cattail
Salt and Salt 1976 Alberta Wetland Nested on a floating mass of aquatic vegetation in reeds (Phragmites)
See et al. 1992 Wyoming Wetland Nested on floating platforms made of sago pondweed and anchored to bulrush (Schoenoplectus spp.)
Smith 1890 Colorado Wetland Nested on heaped masses of water moss anchored to beds of rushes about 15 m from shore in an alkali wetland where water was about 0.46 m deep
Stewart 1975 North Dakota Impoundment, lake, sewage lagoon, wetland Occurred in slightly brackish, moderately brackish, brackish, and subsaline seasonal, semipermanent, and permanent wetlands and lakes that had large expanses of open water, and were also found in large stock ponds, sewage lagoons, or shallow river impoundments; nested on lakes or wetlands ≥4 ha characterized by large beds of submerged aquatic plants such as muskgrass (Chara spp.), sago pondweed, claspingleaf pondweed (Potamogeton richardsonii), widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima), and common watermilfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum); nested on floating structures composed of matted vegetation of submerged aquatic plant species, generally located <90 m from shore in open water, in semi-open stands of emergent vegetation, or in moderately dense cover within a few meters of open water, and with inter-nest distances <3 m; emergent plants used for nesting cover were hardstem bulrush, alkali bulrush (Scirpus maritimus), sprangletop (Scolochloa festucacea), and golden dock (Rumex maritimus)

* In an effort to standardize terminology among studies, various descriptors were used to denote the management or type of habitat. "Idle" used as a modifier (e.g., idle tallgrass) denotes undisturbed or unmanaged (e.g., not burned, mowed, or grazed) areas. "Idle" by itself denotes unmanaged areas in which the plant species were not mentioned. Examples of "idle" habitats include weedy or fallow areas (e.g., oldfields), fencerows, grassed waterways, terraces, ditches, and road rights-of-way. "Tame" denotes introduced plant species (e.g., smooth brome [Bromus inermis]) that are not native to North American prairies. "Hayland" refers to any habitat that was mowed, regardless of whether the resulting cut vegetation was removed. "Burned" includes habitats that were burned intentionally or accidentally or those burned by natural forces (e.g., lightning). In situations where there are two or more descriptors (e.g., idle tame hayland),the first descriptor modifies the following descriptors. For example, idle tame hayland is habitat that is usually mowed annually but happened to be undisturbed during the year of the study.

Literature Cited

Abbott, G. A. 1902. A grebe colony. Bird-Lore 4:86-87.

Allen, G. T., and P. Ramirez. 1990. A review of bird deaths on barbed wire fences. Wilson Bulletin 102:553-558.

Avery, M., and T. Clement. 1972. Bird mortality at four towers in eastern North Dakota. Prairie Naturalist 4:87-95.

Baylor, L. M. 1998. Eared Grebe nesting in Meade County. South Dakota Bird Notes 50:11.

Bent, A. C. 1963. Life histories of North American diving birds. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, New York. 239 pages.

Boe, J. S. 1991. Breeding habitat selection by Eared Grebes in Minnesota. Ph.D. dissertation. North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota. 242 pages.

Boe, J. S. 1992. Wetland selection by Eared Grebes, Podiceps nigricollis, in Minnesota. Canadian Field-Naturalist 106:480-488.

Boe, J. S. 1993. Colony site selection by Eared Grebes in Minnesota. Colonial Waterbirds 16:28-38.

Boe, J. S. 1994. Nest site selection by Eared Grebes in Minnesota. Condor 96:19-35.

Breault, A. M. 1990. Breeding distribution, habitat selection and factors affecting coloniality in Eared Grebes in British Columbia. M.S. thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. 143 pages.

Brown, M., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. Journal of Wildlife Management 50:392-397.

Bryant, R. L. 1983. Eared Grebes make first recorded nesting attempt in Kansas. Kansas Ornithological Society Bulletin 34:27.

Buresh, W. A. 1971. Eared Grebe nesting colony, Burleigh County, North Dakota. Prairie Naturalist 3:44.

Burger, J., and M. Gochfeld. 1995. Nest site selection by Eared Grebes in a Franklin's Gull colony: structural stability parasites. Condor 97:577-580.

Clapp, R. B., M. K. Klimkiewicz, and J. H. Kennard. 1982. Longevity records of North American birds: gaviidae through alcidae. Journal of Field Ornithology 53:81-124.

Cullen, S. A. 1998. Population biology of Eared Grebes in naturally fragmented habitat. M.S. thesis. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia. 89 pages.

Cullen, S. A., J. R. Jehl, Jr., and G. L. Nuechterlein. 1999. Eared Grebe (Podiceps nigricollis). A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America, No. 433. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Daub, B. C. 1993. Effects of marsh area and characteristics on avian diversity and nesting success. M.S. thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 37 pages.

Faaborg, J. 1976. Habitat selection and territorial behavior of the small grebes of North Dakota. Wilson Bulletin 88:390-399.

Faanes, C. A. 1981. Birds of the St. Croix River Valley: Minnesota and Wisconsin. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. North American Fauna 73. 196 pages.

Faanes, C. A. 1982. Avian use of Sheyenne Lake and associated habitats in central North Dakota. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 144. 24 pages.

Faanes, C. A. 1987. Bird behavior and mortality in relation to power lines in prairie habitats. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Technical Report 7. 24 pages.

Faanes, C. A., and G. R. Lingle. 1995. Breeding birds of the Platte River Valley of Nebraska. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online. (Version 02SEP99).

Fredrickson, L. H., and F. A. Reid. 1986. Wetland and riparian habitats: a nongame management overview. Pages 59-96 in J. B. Hale, L. B. Best, and R. L. Clawson, editors. Management of nongame wildlife in the Midwest: a developing art. North Central Section Wildlife Society, Chelsea, Michigan.

Friley, C. E., and G. O. Hendrickson. 1937. Eared Grebes nesting in northwest Iowa. Iowa Bird Life 7:2-3.

Gollop, J. B. 1958. Do Eared Grebes have dump nests? Blue Jay 16:151.

Goss, B. F. 1883. Breeding habits of the Carolina and American Eared Grebes. Ornithologist and Oologist 8:1-2.

Hill, W. L., K. J. Jones, C. L. Hardenbergh, and M. Browne. 1997. Nest distance mediates the costs of coloniality in Eared Grebes. Colonial Waterbirds 20:470-477.

Janssen, R. B. 1987. Birds in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 352 pages.

Jehl, J. R., Jr., and P. K. Yochem. 1986. Movements of Eared Grebes indicated by banding recoveries. Journal of Field Ornithology 57:208-212.

Job, H. K. 1902. Among the waterfowl. Doubleday, Page, and Company, New York, New York. 224 pages.

Johnsgard, P. A. 1980. A preliminary list of the birds of Nebraska and adjacent Plains states. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska. 156 pages.

Judd, E. T. 1917. List of North Dakota birds found in the Big Coulee, Turtle Mountains and Devils Lake Region. As noted during the years 1890 to 1896 and verified in subsequent years to date. Published by the author. Cando, North Dakota. 29 pages.

Kantrud, H. A., and R. E. Stewart. 1984. Ecological distribution and crude density of breeding birds on prairie wetlands. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:426-437.

Knapton, R. W. 1979. Birds of the Gainsborough-Lyleton region. Saskatchewan Natural History Society Special Publication 10. 72 pages.

Knodel, J. 1979. Breeding bird censuses in west-central North Dakota. American Birds 33:104-105.

Koonz, W. H., and P. W. Rakowski. 1985. Status of colonial waterbirds nesting in southern Manitoba. Canadian Field-Naturalist 99:19-29.

Krapu, G. L., and R. K. Green. 1978. Breeding bird populations of selected semipermanent wetlands in south-central North Dakota. American Birds 32:110-112.

Lincoln, F. C. 1939. The migration of American birds. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc., New York, New York. 189 pages.

Lyon, B. E., and S. Everding. 1996. High frequency of conspecific brood parasitism in a colonial waterbird, the Eared Grebe, Podiceps nigricollis. Journal of Avian Biology 27:238-244.

Maher, W. J. 1974. Matador Project: Birds II. Avifauna of the Matador area. Canadian Committee for the International Biological Programme, Matador Project, Technical Report 58. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 31 pages.

Malcolm, J. M. 1982. Bird collisions with a power transmission line and their relation to botulism at a Montana wetland. Wildlife Society Bulletin 10:297-304.

McAllister, N. M. 1958. Courtship, hostile behavior, nest-establishment and egg laying in the Eared Grebe (Podiceps caspicus). Auk 75:290-311.

McKenna, M. G. 1976. Avian mortality from wire collisions. North Dakota Outdoors 39(5):16-18.

National Geographic Society. 1999. Field guide to the birds of North America, third edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C. 480 pages.

Nero, R. W. 1968. Wet waterbirds--a problem at sewage lagoons. Blue Jay 26:2-7.

Ohlendorf, H. M., R. L. Hothem, C. M. Bunck, T. W. Aldrich, and J. F. Moore. 1986. Relationships between selenium concentrations and avian reproduction. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 51:330-342.

Olson, M. M., and D. Welsh. 1993. Selenium in Eared Grebe embryos from Stewart Lake National Wildlife Refuge, North Dakota. Prairie Naturalist 25:119-126.

Ray, J. D., and C. D. Kruse. 1989. Edmunds County Eared Grebe colony. South Dakota Bird Notes 41:43-44.

Roberts, T. S. 1932. The birds of Minnesota, Volume 1. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 691 pages.

Robinson, J. A., L. W. Oring, F. P. Skorupa, and R. Boettcher. 1997. American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana). A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America, No. 275. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.

Rockwell, R. B. 1910. Nesting notes on the American Eared Grebe and Pied-billed Grebe. Condor 12:188-193.

Salt, W. R., and J. R. Salt. 1976. The birds of Alberta. Hurtig Publishers, Edmonton, Alberta. 498 pages.

See, R. B., D. L. Naftz, D. A. Peterson, J. G. Crock, and J. A. Erdman. 1992. Detailed study of selenium in soil, representative plants, water, bottom sediment, and biota in the Kendrick Reclamation Project Area, Wyoming, 1988-1990. Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4131. U.S. Geological Survey, Cheyenne, Wyoming. 142 pages.

Skorupa, J. P. 1998. Selenium poisoning of fish and wildlife in nature: lessons from twelve real-world examples. Pages 315-354 in W. T. Frankenberger, Jr., and R. A. Engberg, editors. Environmental chemistry of selenium. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York.

Skorupa, J. P., and H. M. Ohlendorf. 1991. Contaminants in drainage water and avian risk thresholds. Pages 345-368 in A. Dinar and D. Zilberman, editors. The economics and management of water and drainage in agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts.

Smith, W. G. 1890. Nesting of the Eared Grebe. Ornithologist and Oologist 15:141.

South Dakota Ornithologists' Union. 1991. The birds of South Dakota. Revised edition, South Dakota Ornithological Union, Aberdeen, South Dakota. 119 pages.

Stewart, R. E. 1975. Breeding birds of North Dakota. Tri-College Center for Environmental Studies, Fargo, North Dakota. 295 pages.

Thompson, M. C., and C. Ely. 1989. Birds in Kansas, Volume 1. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Public Education Series 11. Lawrence, Kansas. 404 pages.

Valadka, A. 1988. Eared Grebe, Horned Grebe, and American Coot interactions. Blue Jay 46:199-200.

VanRees-Siewert, K. L. 1993. The influence of wetland age on bird and aquatic macroinvertebrate use of restored Iowa wetlands. M.S. thesis. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 96 pages.

VanRees-Siewert, K. L., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1996. Influence of wetland age on bird use of restored wetlands in Iowa. Wetlands 16:577-582.

Weller, M. W. 1999. Wetland birds: habitat resources and conservation implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York. 271 pages.

Weller, M. W., and L. H. Fredrickson. 1973. Avian ecology of a managed glacial marsh. Living Bird 12:269-291.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Saturday, 02-Feb-2013 05:43:49 EST
Reston, VA [vaww55]