USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

Managing Habitat for Grassland Birds
A Guide for Wisconsin

Identifying Bird Species of Management Concern
and Priority Habitats for Wisconsin


Graphic: Head of Prairie Flower

To properly focus management resources, it is necessary to identify species and habitats in greatest need of management attention. For this purpose, we developed criteria to establish need and then ranked both birds and habitats accordingly.

Species

Of the 40 bird species that require grasslands or a grassland habitat setting for some part of their breeding cycles, not all species are equally deserving of management concern. The following criteria take into account the species' status at a variety of scales, ranging from the species' entire range (global), the Upper Midwest (regional), Wisconsin, Wisconsin's natural divisions, and local sites.

Criteria:

  • Global abundance8
List Bullet: Sandpiper sillhouette Abundance in Wisconsin relative to other states and regions in the species' range
  • Population trend
     List Bullet: Sandpiper sillhouette Wisconsin
     List Bullet: Sandpiper sillhouette USFWS Region 3
      •  Eastern U.S.
      •  Continent
  • Breeding and winter range size8
  • Breeding range trend
List Bullet: Sandpiper sillhouette Relationship of Wisconsin to center of the range
  • Winter season threats8
List Bullet: Sandpiper sillhouette Breeding season threats
List Bullet: Sandpiper sillhouette Habitat specificity
List Bullet: Sandpiper sillhouette Minimum area requirements
  • Benefits from current management activities
  • Current knowledge level of species' ecology and limiting factors.

We ranked all 56 grassland bird species (40 species requiring grasslands, plus 16 generalists that commonly occur in grasslands) using these criteria. We allowed a possible "score" of 1-5 for each criterion, with 5 indicating the highest management need. Criteria marked with a bird icon above were weighted more heavily than the others because we felt they were the most important for establishing management need in Wisconsin. We arrived at a final score for each species by summing the individual scores. Table 3 lists the 56 grassland bird species in ranked order, indicating the score, state status, and long-term monitoring needs for each species.

Figure 2: Bar graph showing percent annual change in the population size of 15 grassland bird species
Figure 2.  Population trends of grassland bird species of management concern in Wisconsin.  Species are listed in taxonomic order. Data are from federal Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) routes in Wisconsin, 1966-1994 (U.S. Department of the Interior 1995). This figure includes only the 15 species for which Wisconsin BBS data are adequate. See Robbins et al. (1996) for a definition of adequate BBS data.

Species scored high in the ranking process for different reasons. For example, Henslow's sparrow scored high for almost all criteria, while bobolink scored high primarily because of consistent range-wide population declines and because it has a large population in Wisconsin compared with many other states. Sedge wren ranked high because it is a habitat specialist, it is relatively abundant in Wisconsin, and Wisconsin is in the center of its range. Brewer's blackbird scored low for most criteria except for a significant population decline across the entire continent and also because we lack knowledge about its ecology and management.

Of the top 25 species, we initially identified 23 as "species of management concern" (Table 3). They are all native grassland birds and all require grasslands during the breeding season. The remaining two species in the top 25—red-headed woodpecker and orchard oriole—are clearly deserving of conservation attention, but they are not species that require grassland habitats. They are species that were historically characteristic of savannas but that are now generalists found in a variety of habitats. In addition to the initial 23 species of management concern, we included three more—northern harrier, Brewer's blackbird, and barn owl—for a total of 26 species. Northern harrier is an area-sensitive species that has generated concern among field ornithologists, in spite of its increasing trend on BBS routes. We know little about Brewer's blackbird, which expanded its range into Wisconsin relatively recently, but it appears to be area-sensitive and is dependent upon grasslands in this state. Barn owl is one of two state-endangered grassland birds in Wisconsin (along with loggerhead shrike). It is a rare, area-sensitive species whose status is poorly known in the state (Matteson and Petersen 1988). These three species, in addition to the top-ranking 23 species that require grasslands, are shown in bold in Table 3. Figure 2 shows population trends for species of management concern for which adequate BBS survey data exists.

Photo by David Sample: Vegetation in a fallow field
An example of diverse or heterogeneous vegetation structure in a fallow field, characterized by a mix of short and tall plants with uneven coverage and exposed soil. Other habitats that can have a similar structure include dry or sand prairie, some barrens, and dry oldfields on sandy sites.  

The species of management concern reflect the full continuum of habitat structure required by grassland birds in Wisconsin, and they demonstrate the need to maintain a diversity of habitat types for the conservation of grassland bird populations in the state; no one or two habitats will accommodate the needs of all species of management concern. Even the top ten species of management concern in our ranked list encompass a wide variety of habitat preferences, such as:

  • Dense wet meadow grasses and sedges (Nelson's sharp-tailed sparrow and yellow rail).
  • Tall and dense grasses and forbs (Henslow's sparrow).
  • Lush medium-height habitats (bobolink and savannah sparrow).
  • Mesic or dry grasslands of moderate to low height (eastern meadowlark).
  • Short and sparse herbaceous vegetation with exposed soil (grasshopper and lark sparrow).
  • Habitats with scattered shrubs (loggerhead shrike and field and lark sparrows).
  • Habitats with homogeneous structures (yellow rail).
  • Habitats with diverse structures (lark and grasshopper sparrow).

Although the 26 species of management concern are listed in ranked order in Table 3, we do not suggest that management effort should focus only on the highest-ranked species. The lower-ranked species are also important for management focus and should not be allowed to "fall through the cracks" while we implement grassland management across the state. This list should be viewed as one of several tools for helping to focus conservation activities (Herkert et al. 1996).


Habitats

We ranked grassland bird habitats based on three major criteria:

  • Current and potential importance to breeding grassland birds (and secondarily to other biota)—current value to grassland birds received more weight than potential value, which can only be realized through future management
  • Rarity
  • Vulnerability to threats
Combinations of these three criteria resulted in 12 ranked habitat categories (Table 4), ranging from habitats that are "important to birds, uncommon, and vulnerable" to habitats that are "not important to birds, common, and secure."

By managing for high priority habitats, managers can provide for the habitat needs of all high priority grassland bird species. Note that there are no habitats in categories 3 (important to birds, uncommon, and secure) or 5 (important to birds, common, and secure), revealing that no habitats that are important to grassland birds are secure, whether uncommon or common. The habitats of greatest value to birds are all in the vulnerable categories, and all native habitats are in the uncommon category.

Because habitats are ranked based on their importance to grassland birds, the rankings do not accurately reflect the value of those habitats to other bird species and communities. For example, while sedge marshes rank lower than sedge meadows and other habitats in their importance to grassland birds, they may be of great importance to some wetland species of conservation concern, including black terns.

High ranking habitats include both native and surrogate grasslands. A variety of factors contribute to their value:

  • Diverse and open barrens, dry or sand prairie, short idle fields of mixed grasses and forbs, medium-height idle fields of mixed grasses and forbs, lightly to moderately grazed pastures, and dry old fields typically attract diverse grassland bird communities.

  • Southern sedge meadows and tall idle fields of grasses and forbs attract less diverse grassland bird communities but are important to some habitat specialists.

  • Open, diverse, and brush prairie barrens, northern sedge meadows, and open bogs are native habitats often occurring on large tracts or in large open landscapes. They attract species requiring large areas, have high current value to birds, and require relatively little effort to be maintained or restored, compared with other native grassland habitats.

  • All types of prairies, as well as oak or river barrens and savannas have high potential value to birds through expansion and restoration of presently degraded or small habitat patches or through buffering with other suitable grassland habitats. Although potentially important habitats for birds, relatively few of these habitats currently exist.

Short and medium-height idle cool season grasses and forbs, which are typically composed of non-native species, rank very high. Fields of this habitat type are usually less expensive to establish than native warm-season grasses and forbs. However, to promote overall biodiversity we should expand, improve, and buffer remnants of native grassland vegetation, including native cool-season and warm-season grasses, or encourage large-scale restorations when feasible.

Photo by Michael Mossman: Prairie Remnant
Most prairie remnants (shown here is Westport Drumlin Prairie State Natural Area in Dane County) occur as small islands in agricultural landscapes. Buffering such remnants with idle grasslands, restored prairie, and other suitable grassland habitats will increase the value of such sites for grassland birds.

      Our species of management concern use the full range of grassland bird habitat structure, and they demonstrate the need to maintain a diversity of habitat types.

Drawing by Jim McEvoy: Henslow's sparrow
Henslow's sparrow

The lower-ranked species are also important for management focus and should not be allowed to "fall through the cracks."

Drawing by Jim McEvoy: Loggerhead Shrike
Loggerhead Shrike

The habitats of greatest value to grassland birds are all vulnerable, and all native habitats are uncommon.
To promote overall biodiversity we should expand, improve, and buffer remnants of native grassland vegetation, and encourage large-scale restorations.

Drawing by Jim McEvoy: Clay-colored sparrow
Clay-colored sparrow

Drawing by Jim McEvoy: Prairie smoke
 Prairie smoke

8 Scores taken from Partners in Flight (1996).

Previous Section -- Overview of Grassland and Grassland Birds Management Issues
Return to Contents
Next Section -- Wisconsin Grassland Bird Habitats

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/wiscbird/identify.htm
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Friday, 01-Feb-2013 20:07:08 EST
Menlo Park, CA [caww54]