Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
When and where did prairie chickens come to use (rely on?) agricultural crops in the winter? Hamerstrom et al. (1941) felt that it is extremely unlikely that they evolved with the development of primitive agriculture but adapted to it when it became available and, by altering their feeding habits, were able to greatly extend their range far north of the original limits. It is instructive to consider the winter foods of prairie chickens in Missouri, perhaps the approximate center of their original range. Korschgen (1962) analyzed an average of 420 droppings per month from 8 counties throughout the western range and Toney (1980) studied 281 droppings collected near the 1680-acre Taberville Prairie Refuge (Table 4).
| Item | Korschgen study | Toney study |
| --------%-------- | ||
| Corn | 45.6 | 22.6 |
| Sorghum | 21.4 | 9.6 |
| Miscellaneous leaf material | 9 | - |
| Green grass | 7 | 3.8 |
| Wild rose | 2.1 | 29.4 |
| Wheat | 1.2 | 19.7 |
Does use indicate need?
Kirsch (1974) argued that winter food is not a priority for prairie chickens
in that they have been documented to utilize buds and will move to winter
food sources. Hamerstrom et al. (1941) demonstrated that prairie chickens
cannot live on buds alone and Burger (1988) related increased mortality with
increased movements. Even if prairie chickens could survive at minimal population
levels in the North without agricultural winter foods, it would seem prudent
to minimize as many of the environmental stresses as possible for a population
that is in jeopardy, such as prairie chickens on the SNG.
Kobriger (1965:789) noted, "Prairie chicken populations shrank as corn
acreages decreased, and today the eastern and southern sandhill borders, with
both grasslands and corn, support the best prairie chicken populations in
Nebraska." Schmidt (1936:200) also speaks of the importance of corn,
"Increase in prairie chicken population and an extension of range resulted
from the extensive growing of corn by the early settlers." Manske (1987)
closely followed the winter habitat use of prairie grouse at the SNG and noted
heavy use of corn and sunflower fields and waste grain spilled along the railroad
tracks bisecting the SNG. He noted as others have that prairie chickens will
pick grain out of cow manure in the winter. He believed that high energy winter
food is the primary limiting factor for prairie grouse on the SNG.
Rumble et al. (1988) found agricultural crops (corn, sunflowers, and soybeans)
made up 72.0, 61.3, and 65.2 (mean x = 65.2%) percent composition of the diet
of SNG prairie chickens in the months of December, January and February. In
comparison, shrubs made up 0.2, 0.9, and 2.7% (mean x = 1.3%) of the winter
diet. Toepfer and Eng (1988) collected 3,945 winter locations from radio-tagged
prairie chickens on the SNG and found agriculture types used in 41% of the
locations and 70.8% of these were "picked corn."
Food and movements
Toepfer and co-workers (Rosenquist and Toepfer 1995) have continued
their studies in northwest Minnesota into what has become the most comprehensive
study ever on the winter ecology of the greater prairie chicken. From 1992-1996
they monitored 224 radio-tagged prairie chickens and determined food accessibility
was a major factor influencing winter movements. Movements of females from
nesting to wintering areas of over 16 km (10 miles) were common while males
generally remained with 4 miles (6.4 km) of their booming grounds. Small grains
and sunflowers were preferred but standing corn was used when other foods
were covered.
Leopold (1931) presented historical accounts which relate migration movements
of prairie chickens to winter food supplies. The evidence suggests that mainly
females migrated to the south to presumably locate food resources not covered
with snow. As corn became a common crop in the more northern areas, prairie
chickens became a year-round resident. If, in fact, females did move farther
south for better winter food resources, why only them and not the males? The
expenses of long movements should have been compensated by some advantage.
By availing themselves of better food resources, females could experience
enhanced reproductive success the following spring and thus pass on the genetic
basis for this behavior. At present, females have larger seasonal ranges than
males and move over twice as far in the winter as males which tend to stay
closer to their "home" booming grounds (Rosenquist and Toepfer 1995).
Church et al. (1989) determined the combustible energy, gross energy, utilization
efficiency, assimilated energy, and metabolizable energy from seeds reported
to be eaten in the winter by greater prairie chickens and ranked them as follows:
Excellent -- millet, soybeans
Good -- sunflowers, lespedeza
Fair -- wheat, corn, sorghum
Poor -- buckbrush, pigweed, switchgrass
Summary