USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

Mallard Recruitment in the Agricultural Environment of North Dakota

Survival of Hens During Spring and Summer


Hens have a greater risk of predation while on the nest than off the nest. Sargeant et al. (1984) estimated that red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) took about 242,000 adult dabbling ducks/year in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota. Twenty-two percent of these were mallards, and 87% of the total ducks were hens. He also estimated that this mortality due to foxes represented 18% of the breeding hens in North Dakota. Johnson and Sargeant (1977) estimated that summer (Apr-Sep) survival for female mallards was 0.692 compared to 0.830 for males based on the results obtained from a simulation model.

Summer mortality of hens is important with regard to recruitment because when hens are killed their nests fail, and there is no opportunity for renesting. Furthermore, an estimate of summer mortality is required for assessing change in population size resulting from changes in recruitment and survival.

Radio-marked birds used in our study furnished an opportunity to measure survival rates during summer. We calculated the total tracking days for each bird and divided the observed deaths by tracking days to obtain a daily mortality rate. This technique, like that of Mayfield (1961), requires the assumption of constant survival. We suspect that mortality is greater in the first part of the season when hens are on nests; therefore, we used 2 periods—the period when most hens are on the nest (Apr through Jun) and the period when most nesting is complete but some hens either are leading broods, are in mixed sex flocks, or are molting (Jul through Sep). The product of the period means (Table 16) furnishes an estimate of survival during summer.

Table 16. Summer survival of hen mallards for 1977-80 in central North Dakota.
Year
Apr-Jun
Jul-Sep
Apr-Sep
Deaths Exposure days Period survival Deaths Exposure days Period survival Period survival
1977 2 1,970 0.914 0 203 1.000 0.914
1978 2 2,003 0.914 0 518 1.000 0.914
1979 9 3,295 0.784 2 1,368 0.874 0.685
1980 5 4,677 0.906 1 1,347 0.939 0.851
All years 18 11,945 0.874 3 3,436 0.922 0.806

Differences among ages, years, and periods were tested with the same techniques used for testing nest success. No differences were significant. Despite our inability to detect differences, we suspect that survival is greater in July-September than in April-June. The period differences are consistent among years and are similar in magnitude. Massive sample sizes would be required to achieve statistical significance because of the very high daily survival rates. The overall April-September survival estimate, 0.806, is higher than the 0.692 summer survival reported by Johnson and Sargeant (1977) because perhaps predators, especially foxes, chew on transmitters and cause some to become inoperative. Furthermore, both foxes and mink often take the carcass into an underground den. The resulting loss in signal strength can prevent detection by the tracking aircraft.

Causes of Summer Mortality

The animal responsible for predation on hens, like the one responsible for nest destruction, is difficult to determine from the characteristics of the kill and thus is somewhat subjective. In several instances we found radios in dens of predators and positive identification was possible. We were conservative in our determinations (Table 17); therefore, 29% of the dead birds were assigned to the class unidentified predator. Our data confirm the findings of Sargeant et al. (1984) who identified the red fox as a major predator of adult dabbling ducks in the northern plains. Foxes not only accounted for 29% of the known spring-summer mortality but probably were responsible for loss of some of the 29% assigned to the unknown predator class. Most fox predation occurs in the spring when most of the hens are vulnerable on the nest and the foxes have young at dens (Sargeant et al. 1984).

Table 17. Cause of death of radio-marked mallard hens during summers 1977-80 in central North Dakota.
Cause of death Period
Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Apr-Sep
N % N % N %
Fox 6 33 0 0 6 29
Mink 1 6 3 100 4 19
Raptor 2 11 0 0 2 10
Unidentified predator 6 33 0 0 6 29
Unknown 1 6 0 0 1 5
Othera 2 11 0 0 2 10
Total 18 100 3 100 21 100
aIncludes 1 loss to probable disease and 1 loss to farm machinery.

The mink (Mustela vison) is the second most destructive predator of mallard hens (Sargeant et al. 1973, Eberhardt and Sargeant 1977). Unlike the fox, the mink takes hens during the latter part of the summer when they are leading broods or molting on wetlands and are vulnerable to predation. Two of the 4 known mink kills were hens that were leading broods. Only 2 hens were known to be lost to raptors, 1 probably a great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) and the other an unknown hawk. Our data suggest that avian predation on the study area was of limited importance.

Disease and accidents also account for minor losses. One bird on a nest was run over by spraying equipment. Although we did not observe hens killed by mowing equipment, such losses, especially in alfalfa, are frequently observed by local farmers. Collision with transmission wires is another type of accidental death that is prevalent on the northern prairies (Krapu 1974; Faanes, pers. commun.). There is some loss of hens to motor vehicles but this is probably infrequent (Sargeant 1981).


Previous Section -- Hen Success
Return to Contents
Next Section -- Brood Survival

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/recruit/hensurv.htm
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Friday, 01-Feb-2013 19:50:56 EST
Menlo Park, CA [caww54]