USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

Le Conte's Sparrows Breeding in Conservation Reserve Program Fields: Precipitation and Patterns of Population Change

Lawrence D. Igl and Douglas H. Johnson


Breeding Le Conte's Sparrows (Ammodramus leconteii) were studied from 1990 to 1996 in perennial grasslands established on fields enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program in the northern Great Plains. The status of Le Conte's Sparrow in these grasslands changed from that of an uncommon breeding species in 1990-1993 to that of one of the most abundant breeding species in 1994-1996. Numerical population lows and highs coincided with drought and amelioration of drought conditions, respectively. Our results emphasize the importance of rangewide conservation efforts and long-term observations of grassland birds.

Key Words: Ammodramus leconteii; climate; Conservation Reserve Program; drought; grassland; Great Plains; Le Conte's Sparrow; populations; precipitation.


Table of Contents

Tables and Figures


Introduction

The climate of the North American Great Plains is highly dynamic, with great year-to-year variability in precipitation and periodic, often extreme, wet and dry cycles (Bragg 1995). Drought is a major force of ecological disturbance on the Great Plains and has played a key role in directing the evolution of the grassland biota of this region (Knopf and Samson 1997). Although grassland birds may differ in their responses to enviromenental variations (Rotenberry and Wiens 1991), climatic variability and concomitant unpredictability of resources strongly influence populations of grassland birds across space and time (Wiens 1974, 1986; Cody 1985). Not surprisingly, breeding bird populations on the Great Plains are highly dynamic, exhibiting considerable annual variation in composition, abundance, and distribution (Johnson and Grier 1988, George et al. 1992, Zimmerman 1992, Igl and Johnson 1997).

Recently, interest in grassland birds has increased with the recognition that many species are declining both continentally (Droege and Sauer 1994) and globally (Goriup 1988). Identification of the specific factors associated with grassland bird declines in North America, however, remains largely enigmatic (Herkert 1997), and it is complicated by the considerable annual fluctuations in grassland bird distribution and abundance (Igl and Johnson 1997). Although there is evidence that land-use changes on the breeding grounds may have contributed to grassland bird declines (e.g., Igl and Johnson 1997), there also is an indication that long-term drought conditions may have influenced recent population changes of some breeding birds on the Great Plains (Droege and Sauer 1989, Peterjohn and Sauer 1993, Bethke and Nudds 1995, Igl and Johnson 1997).

Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammodramus leconteii) is a secretive grassland bird that breeds in central and southern Canada and the northcentral United States (Murray 1969). It winters primarily in the southern United States (Peterson 1980, 1990). Like populations of many grassland breeding birds in North America (Fretwell 1986, Igl and Johnson 1997), Le Conte's Sparrow populations exhibit numerical highs and lows depending on local moisture conditions (Peabody 1901, Stewart 1975, Knapton 1979, Zimmer 1979, Madden 1996). This observation, however, is based largely on anecdotal evidence or short-term observations. Long-term studies of Le Conte's Sparrow populations are limited. Le Conte's Sparrow is poorly represented on the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) because of small sample sizes, poor coverage in the northern portion of its breeding range, and the species' furtive behavior (Sauer et al. 1995). Moreover, dramatic fluctuations in Le Conte's Sparrow abundance tend to obscure the species' long-term population trends on the BBS (Sauer et al. 1995).

In this paper we examine long-term population changes of Le Conte's Sparrows breeding in perennial grassland fields enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) on the northern Great Plains. We discuss patterns of population change of Le Conte's Sparrows associated with changes in precipitation and moisture conditions.

Methods

The CRP of the 1985 Food Security Act removed millions of hectares of highly erodable and environmentally sensitive land from crop production and established perennial grassland for a 10-yr period (Young and Osborn 1990). We surveyed breeding birds from 1990 to 1996 in CRP grassland fields in nine counties in North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, and Montana (Johnson and Schwartz 1993a, b). Le Conte's Sparrows were recorded in only seven of these counties. Herein we report data from those seven counties: Sheridan County, Montana; McPherson and Day Counties, South Dakota; Eddy, Hettinger, and Kidder Counties, North Dakota; and Grant County, Minnesota (Fig. 1). In these counties we surveyed 181 fields (3,565 ha) in 1990; 263 fields (4,843 ha) in 1991; 296 fields (5,468 ha) in 1992; 292 fields (5,360 ha) in 1993; 293 fields (5,369 ha) in 1994; 293 fields (5,369 ha) in 1995; and 290 fields (5,233 ha) in 1996. We selected fields with well-established vegetation because they offered more mature cover and thus a better perspective on long-term, rather than transient, effects. Once a field was selected, we surveyed it in subsequent years unless permission for further access was denied or the field was planted to small grains or row crops. We did not select any new CRP fields after 1993.

Breeding Range Map
Figure 1.  Breeding range (shaded area; Peterson 1980, 1990) of Le Conte's Sparrow in the area of our study in relation to the counties (solid areas) in which Le Conte's Sparrows were observed in CRP fields in the northern Great Plains. North Dakota: h = Hettinger County, e = Eddy County, k = Kidder County; Montana: s = Sheridan County; South Dakota: m = McPherson County, d = Day County; Minnesota: g Grant County.

In the northern Great Plains, most CRP fields were left idle during their contract period, although in nearly every year some CRP fields in the northern Great Plains were released for emergency haying and grazing because of drought or flooding in the region. In this study, these disturbances occurred from 1993 through 1996, and in only a small number of fields each year. The highest percentage of disturbance was in 1996 when 15% of the CRP fields in our study were wholly or partially hayed or, in rare cases, grazed. Although the conditions for releasing CRP lands for emergency haying and grazing varied from year to year, in every year the perturbations occurred after the birds were surveyed (15 July or later).

We surveyed breeding birds using a minor modification of the strip transect procedures used by Stewart and Kantrud (1972) and Igl and Johnson (1997). This method allows a fairly rapid assessment of the breeding birds in a field. Fields were surveyed once each year by one or two observers on foot. Small (≤32 ha) fields usually were surveyed by a single observer; large fields typically were surveyed by two observers, each covering about half of the field. The number and configuration of transects varied depending on field size and shape. Care was taken to avoid double-counting birds. We tallied all breeding pairs, based on singing or calling males, females, observed pairs, or presence of an active nest. We avoided censusing birds in adverse weather conditions (precipitation or winds > 24 km/hr). Surveys began about dawn and continued until midafternoon. Although some surveys were conducted outside the time of most active bird vocalizations (early morning or late evening), Stewart and Kantrud (1972) concluded that singing and other activities of open-country birds were not appreciably affected by time of day during the peak of the breeding season (also see Vickery 1995). We conducted surveys from late May to early July each year, which coincided with the peak breeding season of Le Conte's Sparrow (Stewart and Kantrud 1972, Stewart 1975).

We likely missed some breeding Le Conte's Sparrows in our single annual survey of CRP fields (see Jš and Lokki 1978). We used the same technique each year, however, so any bias, other than differences in observers, should be consistent. Stewart and Kantrud (1972) felt justified in estimating bird populations in open habitats using single counts because many species have behavioral adaptations (e.g., elevated perches, flight songs, synchronous displays) that tend to increase their detectability compared with birds inhabiting wooded areas (also see Cody 1985).

For each county we obtained data for long-term (1961-1990) average precipitation (May of previous year to April of current year) and annual deviations from the average, 1989-1996, taken at the nearest national weather station (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 1987-1996). To describe moisture conditions in the study area, we obtained regional data for the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) for May of each year (NOAA 1997). The PDSI incorporates information on both moisture and temperature and expresses the severity of a wet (positive values) or dry (negative values) period by incorporating past and present conditions. Specifically, PDSI values of 0 to -0.5 indicate normal moisture conditions, -0.5 to -1.0 incipient drought, -1.0 to -2.0 mild drought, -2.0 to -3.0 moderate drought, -3.0 to -4.0 severe drought, and less than -4.0 extreme drought. Similar terms are associated with positive values and wet spells.

Table 1.  Number of breeding pairs of Le Conte's Sparrows observed in Conservation Reserve Program fields in the northern Great Plains, 1990-1996.
County Number of breeding pairs
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Sheridan, MT 0 0 8 0 52 76 99
Eddy, ND 0 1 0 0 206 694 529
Kidder, ND 0 0 0 1 26 148 184
Hettinger, ND 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
McPherson, SD 0 0 0 0 0 47 106
Day, SD 0 0 0 0 2 101 190
Grant, MN 0 0 0 2 4 74 25
Totals 0 1 8 3 290 1,140 1,140

Results

Between 1990 and 1996 we recorded 111 species of birds using CRP grassland fields in the northern Great Plains during the breeding season (L. Igl and D. Johnson, unpubl. data). The number of Le Conte's Sparrows in CRP fields was relatively low in 1990-1993 compared with 1994-1996; fewer than 1% of all breeding pairs were observed in the first 4 of the 7 yr (Table 1). Le Conte's Sparrows were not observed in any CRP field that we surveyed in 1990, the first year of this study. Between 1994 and 1996, Le Conte's Sparrow was one of the most abundant species in CRP fields in the northern Great Plains (Igl and Johnson 1995; L. Igl and D. Johnson, unpubl. data).

Most of the Le Conte's Sparrow's breeding range occurs north of our study area (Stewart 1975; Peterson 1980, 1990; AOU 1983; Janssen 1987; South Dakota Ornithologists' Union [SDOU] 1991; Montana Bird Distribution Committee [MBDC] 1996). Also, Le Conte's Sparrow abundance was not uniform across the region of the study (Table 1, Figs. 1 and 2). The species was most common in 1994-1996 in Eddy and Kidder Counties, North Dakota (Fig. 1), in the interior (albeit southern) portion of the species' breeding range. Le Conte's Sparrows were least abundant in the other five counties, which occur on the southern edge of (Day County, South Dakota; Grant County, Minnesota; and Sheridan County, Montana) or outside (Hettinger County, North Dakota, and McPherson County, South Dakota) the species' known breeding range (Stewart 1975; Peterson 1980, 1990; AOU 1983; Janssen 1987; SDOU 1991; MBDC 1996).

Drought Severity Index
Figure 2.  Palmer Drought Severity Index (solid lines) and breeding densities (dashed lines) of Le Conte's Sparrows in CRP fields in seven counties in the northern Great Plains, 1990-1996.

Our study included some of the driest and wettest years on record in the northern Great Plains (NOAA 1987-1996, 1997). Between 1987 and mid-1993, drought conditions occurred over much of the study area (Table 2, Fig. 2). Numerical increases of Le Conte's Sparrows began in 1994, coincident with dramatic increases in precipitation (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 2). Changes in Le Conte's Sparrow densities generally paralleled changes in moisture conditions for the two counties in the interior of the species' breeding range (Fig. 2). Le Conte's Sparrows, however, exhibited a time lag or delayed numerical response to improved moisture conditions in all counties, especially those on the edge of or outside the species' typical breeding range (Fig. 2). In the extralimital counties (McPherson County, South Dakota, and Hettinger County, North Dakota), colonization of CRP fields coincided with dramatic increases in abundance in the interior of the species' breeding range (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 2). Le Conte's Sparrows were absent from CRP fields in McPherson County until 1995 and in Hettinger County until 1996.

Table 2.  Long-term (1961-1990) average precipitation in centimeters (May of previous year to April of current year) and annual deviations from the average precipitation, 1989-1996, taken at the national weather station nearest each study area.
County Long-term
average
Deviation from the long-term average
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96
Sheridan, MT 32.39 -8.36 +1.57 +10.26 -6.38 +24.92 +2.03 +0.15
Eddy, ND 45.72 +0.58 -2.11 +3.71 -8.33 +22.81 +9.00 +9.45
Kidder, ND 41.10 -13.87 +6.35 +1.83 -7.67 +19.66 +15.42 +11.40
Hettinger, ND 41.88 -13.43 -11.68 -9.34 -13.86 +20.25 +0.64 +4.04
McPherson, SD 40.18 -10.41 +12.57 -9.02 +18.03 +39.29 +15.22 +19.38
Day, SD 53.49 +3.91 +1.40 +11.94 -6.30 +30.10 +12.27 +2.26
Grant, MN 64.72 -3.40 -3.38 +5.61 -1.37 +0.25 -4.50 -3.46

Discussion

Between 1990 and 1996 we recorded four species of Ammodramus sparrows in the grassland habitats established by the CRP in the northern Great Plains: Baird's Sparrow (A. bairdii), Grasshopper Sparrow (A. savannarum), Nelson's Sharp-tailed Sparrow (A. nelsoni), and Le Conte's Sparrow (Johnson and Schwartz 1993a, b). Le Conte's Sparrow is among the most poorly known of these sympatric Ammodramus sparrows (Ehrlich et al. 1988). This likely reflects the species' secretive behavior, weak insect-like song, cryptic appearance, and sporadic distribution and abundance (Walkinshaw 1968, Murray 1969), as well as a general misconception about its habitat affinities (Robbins 1969, 1991). Le Conte's Sparrows also tend to be most vocal in the evening or at night (Murray 1969), a period when few observers visit the species' preferred breeding habitats (Sauer et al. 1995).

During the breeding season, Le Conte's Sparrows generally prefer moister grassland habitats than Baird's or Grasshopper sparrows and drier habitats than Nelson's Sharp-tailed Sparrows (AOU 1983). Although Le Conte's Sparrows tend to avoid areas with permanent standing water, their affinity for tall, dense vegetation in wet meadows and wetland edges has frequently been noted (Davis 1952, Murray 1969, Stewart 1975, Graber and Graber 1976, SDOU 1991). This has resulted in the species being known more as a wetland or wet-meadow species than as a grassland species (Johnsgard 1979, Maxwell et al. 1988).

It is less well known that moist habitats are not necessary for Le Conte's Sparrows during the breeding season (Walkinshaw 1937, Robbins 1969, Cooper 1984). Although Mengel (1970) did not consider Le Conte's Sparrow to be an endemic or secondary grassland bird, he grouped it with other marsh-inhabiting species (e.g., Nelson's Sharp-tailed Sparrow) that have secondary preferences for moist or dry grasslands. This flexibility in habitat selection presumably is not of recent origin (e.g., in response to changes in agriculture) and likely reflects the similarity in grassland-like vegetation structure that is characteristic of both wetlands and grasslands in the species' breeding range. Nonetheless, changes in land use after European settlement probably have influenced the distribution of suitable habitats for this species (Lowther 1996).

In addition to breeding in native prairie, Le Conte's Sparrows regularly breed in other upland grass areas, including pasture, hayland, and retired cropland (Stewart 1975, AOU 1983, Cooper 1984, Renken and Dinsmore 1987, Robbins 1991, Hartley 1994, Igl and Johnson 1995, Madden 1996, Prescott and Murphy 1996). The grassland habitats established by the CRP are similar to the upland habitats used by Le Conte's Sparrows elsewhere in their breeding range. Although vegetation composition varied considerably among fields and counties (Johnson and Schwartz 1993b, Igl and Johnson 1995), most CRP land in this study was planted to a mixture of grasses (mostly cool season) and legumes. In Saskatchewan, Hartley (1994) reported that Le Conte's Sparrow was the second most abundant species in native prairie and the most abundant species in grasslands dominated by grass-legume mixtures and managed for waterfowl production. In Alberta, Prescott and Murphy (1996) reported that Le Conte's Sparrows were more common in pastures dominated by exotic grasses and legumes than in native pastures. In North Dakota, Renken and Dinsmore (1987) found Le Conte's Sparrows in grasslands dominated by grass-legume mixtures and managed for waterfowl production, but in contrast to Hartley (1994) and Prescott and Murphy (1996), they did not find this species in native mixed-grass prairie. Also in North Dakota, Madden (1996) noted the species' affinity for areas dominated by broad-leaved exotic grasses over native prairie.

In semiarid environments such as the northern Great Plains, extreme wet or dry conditions may cause increases, decreases, or no changes in bird populations (e.g., George et al. 1992). Our results indicate that the dramatic population increases of Le Conte's Sparrows during the breeding season coincided with the occurrence of wet conditions (or the amelioration of drought conditions) in the northern Great Plains. This finding was consistent with the anecdotal, but somewhat vague, reports of Peabody (1901), Stewart (1975), Knapton (1979), and Zimmer (1979), each suggesting that Le Conte's Sparrows were more abundant or common during wet years than dry years. Madden (1996) also reported dramatic increases in Le Conte's Sparrow abundance in North Dakota between 1993 and 1994, and she attributed these increases to improved moisture conditions in the region. Le Conte's Sparrows also appear to respond to wet conditions during migration and on their wintering grounds (Grzybowski 1980, Lowther 1996). Although climatic variability may have been a factor leading to these dramatic fluctuations in Le Conte's Sparrow distribution and abundance, our data shed little light on the mechanisms underlying these patterns of population change. Nonetheless, these large population fluctuations suggest strong selection for coping with unpredictable resources in a variable environment.

In general, most birds do not respond directly to a climatic condition such as a prolonged wet or dry period; instead their response is indirect and tempered by the direct effects of climate on primary and secondary production (Wiens 1986, Rotenberry et al. 1995). The suitability of grassland habitats for birds is strongly influenced by floristic composition and vegetation structure (Cody 1985) as well as food resource availability (Wiens 1986, George et al. 1992). Although we did not collect data on annual changes in vegetation structure or food resource availability in the CRP grassland fields, it is reasonable to assume that the extreme variations in moisture availability influenced primary and secondary resources in these grasslands (Wiens 1986, George et al. 1992). Unlike habitats dominated by woody perennials, grasslands are dominated by mostly herbaceous vegetation (grasses, annuals, and some perennials), which responds relatively quickly to climate changes (Wiens 1986). A species' response to a climatic condition, however, may not be immediate. Primary and secondary resources may change through time in response to environmental variation. Additional time lags occur in the conversion of these changes in resources into variations in grassland bird abundance (Wiens 1986).

Data from this study indicate that Le Conte's Sparrows are capable of locating available habitat opportunistically. Dramatic changes of this nature in distribution and abundance have been documented for other grassland and wetland species that breed in the Great Plains and winter elsewhere (e.g., George et al. 1992, Zimmerman 1992). Johnson and Grier (1988) found that grassland-nesting ducks migrating north to their breeding grounds tend to fill breeding habitat in the southern portion of their breeding ranges first. During dry years, however, several species of ducks arriving on the breeding grounds respond by over-flying southern portions of their breeding range, apparently in search of more suitable habitat in the northern portion of the range (Johnson and Grier 1988). Similarly, Baird's Sparrows are more common in northern portions of their breeding range when areas in the southern portions of the range are experiencing drought conditions, and they are less common in the north when areas in the south are experiencing wet conditions (Kantrud and Faanes 1979). Roth (1979) and others (Oberholser and Kinkaid 1974, Robbins and Van Velzen 1974, Fretwell 1986) also alluded to this pattern for Dickcissels (Spiza americana), which nest in the extreme southern portion of their range during wet years, when herbaceous vegetation is lush, but continue north during dry years when conditions are poor for nesting. Roth (1979) suggested that this behavior represents past selection to compensate for unpredictable weather and vegetation conditions.

Although the concept of climate-driven shifts in grassland bird populations is pervasive in the literature, our understanding of these population fluctuations and their conservation implications is poor. Skagen and Knopf (1994) suggested that species that use disjunct patches of changing habitat in an irregular fashion may be the most difficult species to protect in the Great Plains. The large fluctuations in the abundance and distribution of Le Conte's Sparrows emphasize the importance of large-scale conservation efforts such as the CRP for grassland birds. Although the CRP is primarily an agricultural commodities program, many grassland birds have benefited from the network of perennial grasslands established by this program throughout the Great Plains (Johnson and Schwartz 1993a, b; Kantrud 1993; Reynolds et al. 1994; Johnson and Igl 1995; Patterson and Best 1996). The dramatic increase in Le Conte's Sparrow abundance in CRP fields since 1994, however, suggests that these perennial grasslands in the southern portion of the species' breeding range may be an important breeding habitat for this species only under moist conditions (Igl and Johnson 1995). Thus, conservation of grassland birds poses a special challenge that requires an assessment of a species' habitat needs in different portions of its breeding range under various conditions. Managers and policy makers should recognize that negative impacts (e.g., loss and fragmentation of grassland habitat) in a portion of the Great Plains could affect grassland birds that use that area only under certain conditions. Unfortunately, some conservation and land set-aside programs, such as the CRP terminate at international or political borders, whereas breeding ranges and annual shifts in grassland bird populations may involve two or more countries (Johnson and Grier 1988).

In the early years of this study, it was readily apparent that the densities of breeding birds in a county reflected the uneven geographical distributions of a particular species (Johnson and Schwartz 1993b). Data from more recent years also indicate the value of long-term over short-term approaches to studies of grassland breeding birds. In this study, Le Conte's Sparrows were absent or rare in some years and abundant in others. Wiens (1974) noted similar changes in Grasshopper Sparrow populations in Texas; Grasshopper Sparrows were rare or absent during a severe and widespread drought but abundant the year after the drought. Because grassland bird populations fluctuate naturally and dramatically, short-term studies may provide a misleading picture of a changing population captured at one point in time (Wiens 1986). Additionally, a species' response to climatic variation may not be immediate; it may take 1 yr or more for a numerical response to occur. Thus, the probability of observing patterns of population change associated with changes in climate increases with longer term observations.


Acknowledgments

We thank C. J. Johnson, R. L. Manson, L. A. Murphy, K. L. Richardson, M. D. Schwartz, C. M. Shoemaker, M. L. Sondreal, J. M. Steiner, and K. A. Ward for assistance in the field. Without the cooperation of the numerous landowners and operators who allowed access to their property, this study would not have been possible. We appreciate the cooperation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Farm Service Agency (formerly Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Service) state directors and the executive directors and staffs of county Farm Service Agency offices who provided information on CRP fields. H. A. Kantrud, D. L. Larson, D. W. Sample, M. D. Schwartz, P. D. Vickery, and one anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments that greatly improved this paper.


Literature Cited

AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1983. Check-list of North American birds. 6th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.

BETHKE, R. W., and T. D. NUDDS. 1995. Effects of climate change and land use on duck abundance in Canadian prairie-parkland. Ecological Applications 5:588-600.

BRAGG, T. B. 1995. The physical environment of Great Plains grasslands. Pp. 49-81 in A. Joern and K. H. Keeler (editors). The changing prairie: North American grasslands. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

CODY, M. L. 1985. Habitat selection in grassland and open-country birds. Pp. 191-226 in M. L. Cody (editor). Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

COOPER, S. 1984. Habitat and size of the Le Conte's Sparrow's territory. Loon 56:162-165.

DAVIS, D. E. 1952. Le Conte's Sparrow in western Montana. Condor 54:115-116.

DROFGE, S., and J. R. SAUER. 1989. North American Breeding Bird Survey annual summary 1988. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 89(13).

DROEGE, S., and J. R. SAUER. 1994. Are more North American species decreasing than increasing? Pp.297-306 in E. J. M. Hagemeijer and I J. Verstrael (editors). Bird numbers 1992: distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of IBCC and EOAC, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen, and SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, Netherlands.

EHRLICH, P. R., D. S. DOBKIN, and D. WHEYE. 1988. The birder's handbook: a field guide to the natural history of North American birds. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.

FRETWELL, S. 1986. Distribution and abundance of the Dickcissel. Current Ornithology 4:211-242.

GEORGE, T. L., A. C. FOWLER, R. L. KNIGHT, and L. C. McEWEN. 1992. Impacts of a severe drought on grassland birds in western North Dakota. Ecological Applications 2:275-284.

GORIUP, P. D. (EDITOR). 1988. Ecology and conservation of grassland birds. ICBP Technical Publication no. 7. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, U.K.

GRABER, J. W., and R. R. GRABFR. 1976. Environmental evaluations using birds and their habitats. Illinois Natural History Survey Biological Notes no. 97.

GRZYBOWSKI, J. A. 1980. Ecological relationships among grassland birds during winter. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.

HARTLEY, M. J. 1994. Passerine abundance and productivity indices in grasslands managed for waterfowl nesting cover in Saskatchewan, Canada. M.S. thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

HERKERT, J. R. 1997. Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus population declines in agricultural landscapes in the midwestern USA. Biological Conservation 80:107-112.

IGL, L. D., and D. H. JOHNSON. 1995. Dramatic increase in Le Conte's Sparrow in Conservation Reserve Program fields in the northern Great Plains. Prairie Naturalist 27:89-94.

IGL, L. D., and D. H. JOHNSON. 1997. Changes in breeding bird populations in North Dakota: 1967 to 1992-93. Auk 114:74-92.

JANSSEN, R. B. 1987. Birds in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

JARVINEN, 0., and J. LOKKI. 1978. Indices of community structure in bird censuses based on a single visit: effect of variation in species efficiency. Ornis Scandinavica 9:87-93.

JOHNSGARD, P. A. 1979. Birds of the Great Plains: breeding species and their distributions. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.

JOHNSON, D. H., and J. W. GRIER. 1988. Determinants of breeding distributions of ducks. Wildlife Monograph 100:1-37.

JOHNSON, D. H., and L. D. IGL. 1995. Contributions of the Conservation Reserve Program to populations of breeding birds in North Dakota. Wilson Bulletin 107:709-718.

JOHNSON, D. H., and M. D. SCHWARTZ. 1993a. The Conservation Reserve Program and grassland birds. Conservation Biology 7:934-937.

JOHNSON, D. H., and M. D. SCHWARTZ. 1993b. The Conservation Reserve Program: habitat for grassland birds. Great Plains Research 3:273-295.

KANTRUD, H. A. 1993. Duck nest success on Conservation Reserve Program land in the prairie pothole region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48: 238-242.

KANTRUD, H. A., and C. A. FAANES. 1979. Range expansion of Baird's Sparrow in South Dakota. Prairie Naturalist 11:111-112.

KNAPTON, R. W 1979. Birds of the GainsboroughLyleton region (Saskatchewan and Manitoba). Special Publication no. 10, Saskatchewan Natural History Society, Regina, SK.

KNOPF, E L., and E B. SAMSON. 1997. Conservation of grassland vertebrates. Pp. 273-289 in F.L. Knopf and E.B. Samson (editors). Ecology and conservation of Great Plains vertebrates. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.

LOWTHER, P. E. 1996. Le Conte's Sparrow (Ammodramus leconteii). In A. Poole and F Gill (editors). The birds of North America, no. 224. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.

MADDEN, E. M. 1996. Passerine communities and bird-habitat relationships on prescribe-burn, mixed-grass prairie in North Dakota. M.S. thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT

MAXWELL, T C, D. E. MADDEN, and R. C. DAWKINS. 1988. Status of Le Conte's Sparrow, Ammodramus leconteii (Emberizidae), wintering in western Texas. Southwestern Naturalist 33:373-375.

MENGEL, R. M. 1970. The North American central plains as an isolating agent in bird speciation. Pp. 280-340 in W, Dort and J. K. Jones (editors). Pleistocene and recent environments of the central Great Plains. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS.

MONTANA BIRD DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE. 1996. P. D. Skaar's Montana bird distribution. 5th ed. Special Publication no. 3, Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT.

MURRAY, B. G., JR. 1969. A comparative study of the Le Conte's and Sharp-tailed sparrows. Auk 86:199-231.

NATIONAL OCEANIC and ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION. 1987-1996. Climatological data for Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. U.S. Department of Commerce, Asheville, NC,

NATIONAL OCEANIC and ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION. 1997. National Climatic Data Center home page: climate division precipitation, temperature, and drought data. Www.ncdc.noaa.gov/onlineprod/ drough/xmgr.html.

OBERHOLSER, H. C., and E. B. KINKAID, JR. 1974. The birdlife of Texas. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.

PATTERSON, M. P, and L. B. BEST. 1996. Bird abundance and nesting success in Iowa CRP fields: the importance of vegetation structure and composition. American Midland Naturalist 135:153-167.

PEABODY, P. B. 1901. Nesting habits of Le Conte's Sparrow. Auk 18:129-134.

PETERJOHN, B. G., and J. R. SAUER. 1993. North American Breeding Bird Survey annual summary, 1990-1991. Bird Populations 1:52-67.

PETERSON, R. T. 1980. A field guide to the birds. 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

PETERSON, R. T. 1990. A field guide to western birds. 3d ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

PRESCOTT, D. R. C., and A. J. MURPHY. 1996. Habitat associations of grassland birds on native and tame pastures in the aspen parkland of Alberta. Alberta North American Waterfowl Management Plan Centre, Edmonton, AB.

RENKEN, R. B., and J. J. DINSMORE. 1987. Nongame bird communities on managed grasslands in North Dakota. Canadian Field-Naturalist 101:551-557.

REYNOLDS, R. E., T. L. SHAFFER, J. R. SAUER, and B. G. PETERJOHN. 1994. Conservation Reserve Program: benefit for grassland birds in the northern plains. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 59:328-336.

ROBBINS, C. S., and W. T. VAN VELZEN. 1974. Progress report on the North American Breeding Bird Survey. Acta Ornithologica 14:170-191.

ROBBINS, S. 1969. New light on the Le Conte's Sparrow. Passenger Pigeon 31:267-274.

ROBBINS, S. D., JR. 1991. Wisconsin birdlife. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

ROTENBERRY, J. T, R. J. COOPER, J. M, WUNDERLE, and K. G. SMITH. 1995. When and how are populations limited? The roles of insect outbreaks, fire, and other natural perturbations. Pp. 55-84 in T. E. Martin and D. M. Finch (editors). Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds: a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

ROTENBERRY, J. T., and J. A. WIENS. 1991. Weather and reproductive variation in shrubsteppe sparrows: a hierarchical analysis. Ecology 72:1325-1335.

ROTH, R. R. 1979. Vegetation as a determinant in avian ecology. Pp. 162-175 in D. L. Drawe (editor). Proceedings of the First Welder Wildlife Foundation Symposium. Contribution B-7, Welder Wildlife Foundation, Sinton, TX.

SAUER, J. R., B. G. PETERJOHN, S. SCHWARTZ, and J. E. HINES. 1995. The grassland bird home page. Ver. 95.0: www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/grass/grass.htm. U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.

SKAGEN, S. K., and F. L. KNOPF. 1994. Migrating shorebirds and habitat dynamics at a prairie wetland complex. Wilson Bulletin 106:91-105.

SOUTH DAKOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1991. The birds of South Dakota. Northern State University Press, Aberdeen, SD.

STEWART, R. E. 1975. Breeding birds of North Dakota. Tri-College Center for Environmental Studies, Fargo, ND.

STEWART, R. E., and H. A. KANTRUD. 1972. Population estimates of breeding birds in North Dakota. Auk 89:766-788.

VICKERY, P. D. 1995. Grassland bird detectability in New England. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA.

WALKINSHAW, L. H. 1937. Le Conte's Sparrows breeding in Michigan and South Dakota. Auk 54:309-320.

WALKINSHAW, L. H. 1968. Le Conte's Sparrow. Pp. 765-778 in A. C. Bent (editor). Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks. buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows, and allies. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 237, pt. 2.

WIENS, J. A. 1974. Climatic instability and the "ecological saturation" of bird communities in North American grasslands. Condor 76:385-400.

WIENS, J. A. 1986. Spatial scale and temporal variation in studies of shrubsteppe birds. Pp. 159-172 in T. J. Case and J. M. Diamond (editors). Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, NY

YOUNG, E. C., and C. T. OSBORN. 1990. Costs and benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45:370-373.

ZIMMER, K. J. 1979. A birder's guide to North Dakota. L & P Press, Denver, CO.

ZIMMERMAN, J. L. 1992. Density-independent factors affecting the avian diversity of the tallgrass prairie community. Wilson Bulletin 104:85-94.


This resource is based on the following source (Northern Prairie Publication 1062):

Igl, Lawrence D. and Douglas H. Johnson.  1999.  Le Conte's Sparrows Breeding in Conservation Reserve Program Fields: Precipitation and Patterns of Population Change.  Pages 178-186 in P. D. Vickery and J. R. Herkert, eds.  Ecology and Conservation of Grassland Birds of the Western Hemisphere.  Studies in Avian Biology No. 19.

This resource should be cited as:

Igl, Lawrence D. and Douglas H. Johnson.  1999.  Le Conte's Sparrows Breeding in Conservation Reserve Program Fields: Precipitation and Patterns of Population Change.  Pages 178-186 in P. D. Vickery and J. R. Herkert, eds.  Ecology and Conservation of Grassland Birds of the Western Hemisphere.   Studies in Avian Biology No. 19.   Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online.   http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/popchng/index.htm (Version 21JAN2000).


Downloading Instructions -- Instructions on downloading and extracting files from this site.
(Download) popchng.zip( 109K ) -- Le Conte's Sparrows Breeding in Conservation Reserve Program Fields: Precipitation and Patterns of Population Change
Installation: Extract all files and open index.htm in a web browser.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/popchng/index.htm
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Friday, 01-Feb-2013 19:47:18 EST
Sioux Falls, SD [sdww55]