Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
![]() |
| Figure 1. Habitat maps of plots with centrally located predator barrier fences. Cropland includes existing CRP cover; other includes hayland, odd areas such as field corners, planted cover, right-of-ways, scrub, and woodland. |
![]() |
|
| Figure 2. Simulated production of recruits on Plots 601 and 701 when amount of the plot fenced varied from 0 - 35%. Plot 601 had 35% grassland and Plot 701 had 5% grassland. | |
![]() |
![]() |
| Figure 3. Simulated production of recruits on Plots 601 and 701 when amount of the plot in CRP cover in the plot varied from 0 - 35%. Plot 601 had 35% grassland and Plot 701 had 5% grassland. | |
![]() |
| Figure 4. Simulated production of recruits on Plot 701. Plot had predator fence, and CRP cover varied from 0 - 35%. |
![]() |
| Figure 5. Benefit-cost analysis for adding predator fencing to a hypothetical 2-habitat plot containing grassland and fenced cover. Straight lines illustrate cost for obtaining $35,000 worth of ducks given breeding populations of 500 and 600 pairs. The rightmost end of the curves represent treating 25% of the plot (At= 0.25). |
![]() |
| Figure 6. Benefit-cost analysis for adding CRP cover to a hypothetical 2-habitat plot containing grassland and CRP cover. Straight lines illustrate benefit and cost at maximum net benefit for a breeding population of 500 pairs. The rightmost end of the curves represent treating 50% of the plot (At= 0.05). |