USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

Population Dynamics of Breeding Waterfowl

VIII. Discussion

B. Recommendations for Future Research


It is altogether too easy to develop a long shopping list of unanswered questions about the population dynamics of breeding waterfowl. We identify topics where information voids are particularly acute and commend study approaches that we found especially productive. An overriding shortcoming is the lack of information on waterfowl that breed outside of the arctic or temperate zone.

1. Components of the Population Dynamics

Available estimates of relevant quantities involved in breeding-season dynamics differ substantially in quality. Both survival rate and homing and pioneering rates are important determinants of the number of potential breeding birds. Useful estimates of annual survival rates are available for a number of populations. Future efforts to estimate survival should focus on the timing of mortality within the year and the causes of deaths. Rates of homing and pioneering have not always been estimated well, in part because return rates, the usual estimators of homing, are functions of survival, homing, and resighting. Conditional homing probabilities should be estimable from models that use both band recovery and mark-recapture data.

Good estimates of the probability that a sexually mature bird will breed and of the probability of renesting after failure (or success) of previous nesting efforts are few. Our modeling exercise demonstrated the significance of these quantities, but the values we used mostly lacked empirical foundations.

Clutch size and egg size have been well estimated for many waterfowl species, but the ultimate factors responsible for variation are not clearly understood. A number of proximate factors have been identified, however, and our knowledge of these components seems consistent with their importance to breeding dynamics.

Egg survival, specifically nest success, has been estimated for a number of populations during the past decade. Recent work has shown considerable geographic and temporal variation within a species, usually related to predator pressure and habitat conditions. The causes of this variation are worthy of considerable attention, particularly in view of the importance of egg survival to the breeding ground population dynamics of waterfowl. Specific questions involve determining the causes of clutch destruction and isolating the effect of nest density on survival probability.

There are relatively few good estimates of brood survival for waterfowl, in testament to the difficulty of studying the often-elusive young. Yet brood survival rates are critical in the dynamics; our modeling exercises placed them first or second in importance (after nest success) for the three populations considered. Further, the causes of brood loss are almost never known.

2. Inherent and Environmental Influences on the Components

Our understanding of the factors influencing various components of breeding ground population dynamics is uneven. Differences among species in most components have been examined, although only for a fraction of the 149 or so species of extant waterfowl. The effect of age and breeding experience on many components has been investigated widely, especially in recent years. Needed now are attempts to separate the closely intertwined effects of age, breeding experience, bird condition, and social status. Individual variation has been at least hinted at in a number of studies, but its role and importance are as yet not fully appreciated. Geographic variation has been acknowledged, but because weather, habitat conditions, population densities, and a variety of other factors also vary geographically, clear relationships are difficult to isolate.

Among the environmental influences, wetland conditions are most prominent, as they have been shown to affect all components. Nesting habitat certainly affects egg survival and perhaps other components. Weather exerts a strong influence on many components, notably brood survival, egg survival, and breeding incidence. The effect of population density has been suggested for brood survival but is less clearly indicated for most of the other components. This factor merits much more work, especially as management strategies may concentrate waterfowl in diminished habitats. Disease, parasites, and environmental contaminants have been pointed to as factors relevant to waterfowl population dynamics, but their roles on the breeding grounds are poorly understood.

3. Study Approaches

Other things being equal, a long-term study produces more valuable findings than one of short duration. Investigators can build on what was learned earlier to advance their understanding. Also, a population followed for a number of years is likely to be exposed to varying environmental conditions, such as weather, wetlands, and predators, and both high and low population densities. Such variation facilitates the drawing of appropriate conclusions.

Experimental studies are also needed to supplement findings from observational approaches. There are too many correlated variables in natural situations to sort out the individual effects of specific variables. Some of the more exciting findings of recent years were based on innovative research designs, a trend we strongly endorse. Some experimental studies require the use of captive animals. Care should be taken to simulate natural conditions as closely as feasible, and results from captive situations should be confirmed in natural populations before firm conclusions are reached.


Previous Section -- Discussion--Critical Components
Return to Contents
Next Section -- Discussion--Management Considerations

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/birds/ecomanag/popdynam/recomm.htm
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Friday, 01-Feb-2013 19:18:53 EST
Menlo Park, CA [caww54]