Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center
Population Dynamics of Breeding Waterfowl
VIII. Discussion
C. Management Considerations
Many species of birds are of interest to wildlife managers, either because they are rare and their populations
must be carefully protected, or because they are game
species for which hunters desire greater numbers. Fortunately, few waterfowl species are threatened (exceptions
include White-winged Wood Duck and Hawaiian
Goose), but many of them are hunted, including virtually all species for which we have good information on
population dynamics. For many of the game species,
however, numbers are no longer adequate to satisfy the
demands of hunters. Wildlife management agencies
seeking to increase the population size of some species can
try to increase survival rates, reproduction rates, or both.
Altering hunting mortality rates without antagonizing the
hunting public is often politically difficult and may be
biologically ineffective as well (Anderson and Burnham
1976). The alternative is to manage reproduction rates. This
review has indicated in a general way the potentially
important and manageable components of production:
those that are influential in the dynamics and those that can
be altered. For the three populations we modeled, different
sets of components were most influential. Not only do the
influential components vary from one population to the
next, but also the manageability of these components is
likely to differ.
One approach to managing breeding ground population
dynamics would be to identify the reproductive component
that explained the greatest proportion of the total variation
in reproductive rate and try to influence that component in a
cost-effective manner. For example, if reproductive output is
closely tied to nest success for a particular species, a
natural management tactic would be to increase nest
success rates. This may be a reasonable action, but we
caution that results may not be as profitable as anticipated.
If nest success rates increased, say, from 10% to 50%, our
simplified model might predict a very large increase in
reproductive output and a substantial increase in the
population. However, the hypothesized increase in nest
success would greatly increase the number and density of
broods. Any density-dependent brood mortality might erase
much of the potential gain caused by higher nest success.
That one component of reproductive rate is most important
under one set of conditions and another is the most
influential under other conditions is analogous to
Hestbeck's (1987) recent discussion of multiple regulation
states for populations. This possibility enhances the value
of studies and management programs that manipulate
values of reproductive components.
Previous Section -- Discussion--Recommendations for Future Research
Return to Contents
Next Section -- Acknowledgments