USGS - science for a changing world

Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center

  Home About NPWRC Our Science Staff Employment Contacts Common Questions About the Site

Importance of Individual Species of Predators on Nesting Success of Ducks in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region


Analysis of the explanatory variables
Of the five carnivores, the coyote had the highest average index of activity (Table 1), followed by the skunk, fox, raccoon, and badger. Indices for magpies were much lower than those for crows, and the Franklin's ground squirrel had a very low index. These results do not necessarily indicate the relative abundance of the different predators; indices are of three non-comparable types and, even for the five carnivores for which indices were based on tracks, equal values need not translate to equal abundance. The Franklin's ground squirrel and magpie seemed the most variable, as measured by the coefficient of variation. The coyote was the least variable, followed by the skunk.

Table 1. Explanatory variable: mean, interquartile range (IQR), and coefficient of variation (CV) for indices of activity of eight predators, indices of two wetland types, and a measure of spring precipitation
  Mean IQR CV (%)
Badger 0.25 0-0.40 142
Raccoon 0.36 0-0.53 162
Striped skunk 1.01 0.42-1.54 69
Red fox 0.73 0-1.26 109
Coyote 1.56 0.84-2.23 56
Crow 0.45 0.08-0.63 114
Magpie 0.022 0-0.027 190
Franklin's ground squirrel 0.011 0-0.008 232
Seasonal wetlands 58.3 37-86 51
Semipermanent wetlands 85.5 78-98 20
Precipitation (cm) 13.4 10.7-16.5 32

Several highly significant correlations existed among the predator indices (Table 2). The strongest was the negative relationship between fox and coyote indices (r = -0.51), a finding consistent with the spatial avoidance and agonistic behavior between these two canids (Dekker 1983; Voigt and Earle 1983; Sargeant et al. 1987a; Major and Sherburne 1987). Also, indices of the badger and skunk were negatively related (r = -0.46). Little is known of relations between these two species, but Sargeant et al. (1982) reported two instances of badgers preying on young skunks. Two other patterns were evident: (i) a general association among indices of the fox, skunk, and raccoon; and (ii) an association among indices of coyote, magpie, and Franklin's ground squirrel. Crow indices were positively related to those of the Franklin's ground squirrel, skunk, magpie, and coyote, and negatively related to raccoon and badger. Raccoons climb trees and may depredate crow nests. Badger indices were positively associated with those of no other species, but negatively associated with indices of the skunk, magpie, and crow.

Table 2. Correlation coefficients between explanatory variables

  Raccoon Skunk Fox Coyote Crow Magpie Ground
Seasonal Semipermanent Precipitation
Badger 0.06 -0.46 -0.08 0.04 -0.11 -0.15 0.02 -0.06 -0.01 -0.19
Raccoon   0.16 0.22 -0.11 -0.19 -0.04 -0.05 0.21 0.16 -0.05
Striped skunk     0.34 -0.01 0.16 -0.06 -0.02 0.04 -0.03 0.15
Red fox       -0.51 -0.05 -0.15 -0.18 0.18 0.08 -0.07
Coyote         0.12 0.15 0.15 -0.17 -0.03 0.35
American crow           0.14 0.32 -0.09 -0.17 -0.03
Black-billed magpie             0.08 -0.16 -0.12 0.06
Franklin's ground squirrel               0.05 -0.04 -0.00
Seasonal wetlands                 0.78 0.35
Semipermanent wetlands                   0.49
NOTE: Significance levels for |r| are r0.05 = 0.06 and r0.01 = 0.08.

Correlations with seasonal wetland counts were positive for the raccoon and fox, and negative for the coyote and magpie (Table 2). Correlations with semipermanent wetland counts were positive for raccoon and negative for crow and magpie. Correlations with precipitation indices were positive for coyote and skunk and negative for badger. These correlations between predator indices and pond counts or precipitation indices represent association; we mean to imply no cause-and-effect relationship. The precipitation index was positively correlated with indices of both seasonal (r = 0.35) and semipermanent (r = 0.49) wetlands. The correlation between the two wetland indices was 0.78.

Analysis of daily predation rate on early nests
There were 559 observations (quarters with nests found during the early searches) for this analysis. Included were 1791 nests, mostly mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), blue-winged teal (Anas discors), northern pintails (Anas acuta), and northern shovelers (Anas spatula) (Table 3). The average daily predation rate on early nests was 0.057, with an interquartile range of 0.033-0.158. Correlations between daily predation rate of early nests and the explanatory variables, weighted by exposure, were positive for fox, crow, and skunk, and negative for coyote and both wetland counts (Table 4). The analysis of variance for the full model was significant overall (F = 3.84, df = 11,547, P < 0.0001). Standardized regression coefficients are given in Table 4; these were obtained by subtracting from each explanatory variable its mean and dividing by its standard deviation. Regression coefficients were positive for indices of all predators except coyote and magpie, but because of intercorrelations among the explanatory variables, these coefficients were not all well-conditioned and are difficult to interpret. We successively eliminated nonsignificant explanatory variables, and ultimately obtained an equation involving only indices of fox, crow, badger, and the seasonal wetland count (Table 4). Coefficients of the three predator indices were positive and that of the wetland count was negative. The overall equation was highly significant (F = 8.77, df = 4,554, P < 0.0001) despite a small multiple correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.060). The badger index was marginally significant in the final equation, in spite of its minor importance in the initial one. Conversely, the skunk index was absent in the final equation, although it correlated rather strongly with daily predation rate. These discrepancies resulted from the intercorrelations among the explanatory variables; for example, the pronounced correlation between fox and skunk indices (r = 0.34) made it difficult to distinguish the separate effects of the two species.

Table 3. Species composition of early and late clutches used in the analysis
  Early clutches Late clutches
Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) 735 (41.8%) 294 (22.2%)
Gadwall (Anas strepera) 64 (3.6%) 288 (21.8%)
American wigeon (Anas penelope) 43 (2.4%) 88 (6.7%)
Green-winged teal (Anas crecca) 21 (1.2%) 23 (1.7%)
Blue-winged teal (Anas discors) 371 (20.7%) 308 (23.3%)
Northern shoveler (Anas spatula) 195 (10.9%) 139 (10.5%)
Northern pintail (Anas acuta) 352 (19.7%) 105 (7.9%)
Lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) 6 (0.3%) 76 (5.7%)
Other 4 (0.2%) 2 (0.2%)
Total 1791 1323

Table 4. Correlation coefficients and standardized regression coefficients relating daily predation rates of early and late clutches to explanatory variables

Early clutches

Late clutches

   Correlation Regression coefficients Correlation

Regression coefficients

Initial Final Initial Final
Badger 0.03 0.038 0.027* -0.04 -0.011  
Raccoon 0.01 0.019   0.02 0.006  
Striped skunk 0.09 0.010   0.16 0.028 0.027
Red fox 0.18 0.048 0.069*** 0.21 0.052 0.055**
Coyote -0.09 -0.042   -0.01 0  
American crow 0.11 0.037 0.039** 0.06 0.006  
Black-billed magpie -0.02 0.005   0.04 0.004  
Franklin's ground squirrel 0.04 0.013   -0.02 0.000  
Seasonal wetlands -0.08 -0.034 -0.037** -0.10 0.033  
Semipermanent wetlands -0.11 -0.028   -0.18 -0.087 -0.060***
Precipitation -0.01 0.037   0.02 0.001  
*P < 0.10.
**P < 0.01.
***P < 0.0001.

Analysis of daily predation rate on late nests
We had 424 observations available for this analysis, involving 1323 nests of mostly blue-winged teal, mallards, and gadwalls (Anas strepera) (Table 3). The average daily predation rate was 0.044, with an interquartile range of 0-0.146. Correlations between daily predation rate of late nests and the explanatory variables, weighted by exposure, were positive for fox and skunk, and negative for the wetland indices, especially that of semipermanent wetlands (Table 4). The analysis of variance for the full model was significant (F = 3.69, df = 11,412, P < 0.0001). Regression coefficients are given in Table 4. Regression coefficients for predator indices were positive except for those of badger and Franklin's ground squirrel. After successively eliminating nonsignificant explanatory variables, we obtained an equation involving only indices of fox, skunk, and the semipermanent wetland count (Table 4). Regression coefficients of both predator indices were positive, and that of the wetland count was negative. The overall equation was highly significant (F = 12.98, df = 3,420, P < 0.0001), with R2 = 0.085. The skunk index was retained in this equation despite its marginal significance (P = 0.11) because of its strong first-order correlation with daily predation rate (Table 4).

Previous Section -- Methods
Return to Contents
Next Section -- Discussion

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information: Webmaster
Page Last Modified: Friday, 01-Feb-2013 19:12:38 EST
Menlo Park, CA [caww54]